Skip to content
GitHub Explorer

AggLayer/pessimistic-proof

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

Pessimistic proof for the AggLayer.

active 2024-05-29 → 2024-06-22 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,594 / 26,594 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-15 → 2026-08-27 (UTC)
Events
74
Pushes
6
Pull requests
4
Issues
6
Stars
15
Forks
6

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 25 days from 2024-05-29 to 2024-06-22. Pushes: 6 total, peak 3 in a day. Pull requests: 4 total, peak 2 in a day. Issues: 6 total, peak 3 in a day. Comments: 24 total, peak 5 in a day. Stars: 15 total, peak 3 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
hadjiszs12524
pgebheim10115
bpfarmer8006
plafer4002
krlosMata4004
paulgoleary3012
Raneet101001

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#18pgebheim2024-06-21 23:11
    Local Pessimistic Proofs and Cross-Chain Consistency Checks
  • Issue comment#18bpfarmer2024-06-21 19:24
    Local Pessimistic Proofs and Cross-Chain Consistency Checks
  • Issue comment#18krlosMata2024-06-21 15:01
    Local Pessimistic Proofs and Cross-Chain Consistency Checks
  • Issue comment#18bpfarmer2024-06-21 14:26
    Local Pessimistic Proofs and Cross-Chain Consistency Checks
  • Issue comment#18krlosMata2024-06-21 07:44
    Local Pessimistic Proofs and Cross-Chain Consistency Checks
  • Issue comment#18bpfarmer2024-06-20 18:30
    Local Pessimistic Proofs and Cross-Chain Consistency Checks
  • Issue comment#18bpfarmer2024-06-20 17:35
    Local Pessimistic Proofs and Cross-Chain Consistency Checks
  • Issue comment#18krlosMata2024-06-20 13:51
    Local Pessimistic Proofs and Cross-Chain Consistency Checks
  • Issue comment#18pgebheim2024-06-20 12:24
    Local Pessimistic Proofs and Cross-Chain Consistency Checks
  • Issue#18bpfarmer2024-06-20 02:57
    Solving Local Accounting Proofs and Cross-Chain Consistency Checks
  • Issue comment#17bpfarmer2024-06-19 23:01
    Using an arithmetic hash in the LBT
  • Issue#17bpfarmer2024-06-19 19:01
    Using an arithmetic hash in the LBT
  • Issue comment#16hadjiszs2024-06-18 13:44
    feat: adapt the API to use initial state + certificates as inputs
  • Pull request#16hadjiszs2024-06-18 13:30
  • Issue#15hadjiszs2024-06-11 12:14
    Use Initial State + Certificates as inputs of the pessimistic proof
  • Issue comment#10hadjiszs2024-06-05 12:28
    Handle balance on origin network correctly
  • Issue comment#3hadjiszs2024-06-05 12:05
    Leaf proof: use precomputed "empty roots" for each depth
  • Issue#14pgebheim2024-06-04 20:22
    End-to-End Tests on Succint Infra
  • Issue#13pgebheim2024-06-04 20:18
    Expand unit test cases
  • Issue comment#10pgebheim2024-06-04 20:16
    Handle balance on origin network correctly
  • Issue comment#3pgebheim2024-06-04 20:09
    Leaf proof: use precomputed "empty roots" for each depth
  • Issue#4pgebheim2024-06-04 20:08
    Explicitly model the leaf type in `Withdrawal`
  • Issue comment#4pgebheim2024-06-04 20:08
    Explicitly model the leaf type in `Withdrawal`
  • Issue comment#10krlosMata2024-06-04 08:01
    Handle balance on origin network correctly
  • Issue comment#4paulgoleary2024-06-03 23:29
    Explicitly model the leaf type in `Withdrawal`

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 15 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.