Skip to content

[CVPR 2022] The official implementation of our CVPR 2022 paper "Protecting Facial Privacy: Generating Adversarial Identity Masks via Style-robust Makeup Transfer".

active 2023-08-212025-11-16 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,681 / 26,681 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-30 (UTC)
Events
58
Pushes
0
Pull requests
0
Issues
6
Stars
44
Forks
3

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 819 days from 2023-08-21 to 2025-11-16. Pushes: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 6 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 5 total, peak 1 in a day. Stars: 44 total, peak 2 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
yuuma0022002
ZTMIDGO2000
StephenYF1000
AaronSun20001000
Leminhbinh02091001
fangxuehouwuming1001
SheltonLiu-N1000
parham19981001
Achestnut001000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#27fangxuehouwuming2025-01-25 10:07
    Some questions about evaluations of image quality(FID、RSNR、SSIM)
  • Issue#27Achestnut002025-01-11 06:38
    Some questions about evaluations of image quality(FID、RSNR、SSIM)
  • Issue#26StephenYF2024-12-29 11:54
    On the issue of dual-device training
  • Issue comment#16yuuma0022024-12-03 00:17
    We do not know the matchup of the `(source, target)` for evaluation(i.e. we do not know the matchup of the images in different groups and the target identity that you have aimed) although you have uploaded `pair.zip` and `assets.zip`.
  • Issue comment#21parham19982024-03-12 13:53
    CUDA device problem
  • Issue comment#16yuuma0022024-01-04 01:20
    We do not know the matchup of the `(source, target)` for evaluation(i.e. we do not know the matchup of the images in different groups and the target identity that you have aimed) although you have uploaded `pair.zip` and `assets.zip`.
  • Issue comment#16Leminhbinh02092024-01-03 08:51
    We do not know the matchup of the `(source, target)` for evaluation(i.e. we do not know the matchup of the images in different groups and the target identity that you have aimed) although you have uploaded `pair.zip` and `assets.zip`.
  • Issue#25SheltonLiu-N2023-09-05 15:17
    生成效果差
  • Issue#25ZTMIDGO2023-09-05 07:50
    生成效果差
  • Issue#24AaronSun20002023-08-21 15:44
    How to set the threshold on different datasets to evaluate the FR models using TAR@FAR?
  • Issue#23ZTMIDGO2023-08-21 13:25
    How to convert to ONNX

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 44 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.