Draft COMCIFS documents
active 2024-10-11 → 2026-06-29 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 627 days from 2024-10-11 to 2026-06-29. Pushes: 15 total, peak 2 in a day. Pull requests: 14 total, peak 4 in a day. Issues: 9 total, peak 1 in a day. Comments: 24 total, peak 4 in a day. Stars: 0 total, peak 0 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| jamesrhester | 44 | 13 | 5 | 14 |
| rowlesmr | 15 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| vaitkus | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| nautolycus | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| briantoby | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue comment#48nautolycus2026-02-20 11:54Added details for spinCIF
- Issue#47vaitkus2026-02-17 10:15Dictionary naming.md: should spinCIF be added to the table?
- Pull request#46nautolycus2026-02-10 11:57
- Pull request#41jamesrhester2025-07-14 01:49
- Pull request#40jamesrhester2025-07-14 01:46
- Pull request#41rowlesmr2025-07-11 10:43
- Pull request#40rowlesmr2025-07-11 09:48
- Issue comment#28jamesrhester2025-06-18 07:51Should compare and harmonise with previous Toby et. al. paper
- Issue#28jamesrhester2025-06-18 07:51Should compare and harmonise with previous Toby et. al. paper
- Pull request#37jamesrhester2025-06-18 01:25
- Issue comment#25jamesrhester2025-06-16 06:48Guide to presenting complex results based on powder refinements
- Issue comment#28rowlesmr2025-06-16 03:20Should compare and harmonise with previous Toby et. al. paper
- Issue comment#33jamesrhester2025-06-16 02:24potentially redundent data names in CIF examples - powder data presentation
- Issue#33jamesrhester2025-06-16 02:24potentially redundent data names in CIF examples - powder data presentation
- Issue#20vaitkus2025-06-13 07:46ddlm_dictionary_style_guide.md: exclude `_method.expression` from some indendation rules
- Pull request#39vaitkus2025-06-13 07:46
- Pull request#39vaitkus2025-06-12 23:02
- Issue comment#33rowlesmr2025-06-11 10:51potentially redundent data names in CIF examples - powder data presentation
- Issue comment#33rowlesmr2025-06-11 10:50potentially redundent data names in CIF examples - powder data presentation
- Issue comment#28rowlesmr2025-06-11 10:44Should compare and harmonise with previous Toby et. al. paper
- Issue comment#33jamesrhester2025-06-11 08:25potentially redundent data names in CIF examples - powder data presentation
- Issue#30jamesrhester2025-06-10 04:51Examples should include `_refln.id`
- Pull request#35jamesrhester2025-06-10 04:51
- Issue comment#35jamesrhester2025-06-10 04:51add _refln.id to REFLN loops
- Pull request#37rowlesmr2025-06-06 11:41
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 0 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.