Skip to content

CPP-Network-Vector-Database/WeeklyProgress

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

active 2025-02-202025-06-06 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,452 / 26,452 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-21 (UTC)
Events
235
Pushes
184
Pull requests
18
Issues
11
Stars
0
Forks
5

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 107 days from 2025-02-20 to 2025-06-06. Pushes: 184 total, peak 19 in a day. Pull requests: 18 total, peak 2 in a day. Issues: 11 total, peak 9 in a day. Comments: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Stars: 0 total, peak 0 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
namita-ach696810
Vishal-Srinivasa434300
vanillacoke77383800
ajayshanbhog237160
varshinigopal04171700
vrenj11000
m-anshu10910

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Pull request#21ajayshanbhog2025-05-30 10:12
  • Pull request#21ajayshanbhog2025-05-30 10:12
  • Pull request#20ajayshanbhog2025-04-18 10:24
  • Pull request#20ajayshanbhog2025-04-18 10:23
  • Pull request#19ajayshanbhog2025-04-07 06:42
  • Pull request#19ajayshanbhog2025-04-07 06:41
  • Pull request#18ajayshanbhog2025-03-28 10:06
  • Pull request#18ajayshanbhog2025-03-28 10:05
  • Issue#17vrenj2025-03-28 09:44
    Could you print the distances as well? That will help to determine the accuracy with large datasets
  • Issue#16vrenj2025-03-28 09:41
    Isn't faiss_index.add() needed here with the vector?
  • Pull request#15ajayshanbhog2025-03-27 07:12
  • Pull request#15ajayshanbhog2025-03-27 07:12
  • Pull request#14ajayshanbhog2025-03-26 17:39
  • Pull request#14ajayshanbhog2025-03-26 17:39
  • Issue#12vrenj2025-03-21 06:24
    What about using indexing methods supported by Weaviate? (IVF or HNSW)
  • Issue#11vrenj2025-03-21 06:23
    Where do you measure similarity score of the result?
  • Issue#10vrenj2025-03-21 05:43
    You need to consider performance with different batch sizes
  • Issue#9vrenj2025-03-21 05:41
    Update should not consider search latency
  • Issue#8vrenj2025-03-21 05:40
    What about disctance similarity score for the result obtained?
  • Issue#7vrenj2025-03-21 05:05
    It's 5-tuple, so you should take in to account transport layer ports as well.. src_port, dst_port
  • Issue#6vrenj2025-03-21 04:58
    Why? This is going to cause more overhead and affect efficiency.
  • Issue#5vrenj2025-03-21 04:52
    Why limit it to 1 worker? if you have multiple cores in system, programmatically find that and use that instead.
  • Issue#4vrenj2025-03-21 04:41
    Did you chosse 128 for efficiency? WHat is the trade-off here?
  • Pull request#3ajayshanbhog2025-03-14 09:48
  • Pull request#3ajayshanbhog2025-03-14 09:48

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 0 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.