Skip to content

CausalInferenceLab/OCE-Materials

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

온라인 통제 실험 스터디 자료 모음

active 2024-02-112025-03-01 (UTC)

Partial coverage20,514 / 26,270 hourly files (78%) · 2 absent upstream · 5,753 failed, retryable2023-08-152026-08-13 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
67
Pushes
9
Pull requests
0
Issues
10
Stars
37
Forks
2

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 385 days from 2024-02-11 to 2025-03-01. Pushes: 9 total, peak 3 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 10 total, peak 7 in a day. Comments: 6 total, peak 4 in a day. Stars: 37 total, peak 14 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
be-favorite20904
hyejahaha2002
ddongmiin2000
knit-factory1000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue#10be-favorite2024-07-13 05:20
    팀마다 KPI가 다를 텐데, 어떻게 각 팀의 KPI를 포괄해 OEC를 만들 수 있을까?
  • Issue comment#9be-favorite2024-07-13 05:17
    OEC를 활용하기 어렵다면 어떻게 트레이드오프를 실험에 반영할 수 있을까?
  • Issue#9be-favorite2024-07-13 05:17
    OEC를 활용하기 어렵다면 어떻게 트레이드오프를 실험에 반영할 수 있을까?
  • Issue comment#8be-favorite2024-07-13 05:13
    OEC를 실무에서 활용하는 사례가 많은가?
  • Issue#8be-favorite2024-07-13 05:13
    OEC를 실무에서 활용하는 사례가 많은가?
  • Issue#7be-favorite2024-07-13 05:01
    목표 지표와 가드레일지표의 밸런스 - Case Study
  • Issue comment#6be-favorite2024-07-13 05:00
    이벤트가 있을 때 실험을 피해야 할 것인가? 그대로 진행하는 것이 좋은 것인가?
  • Issue#6be-favorite2024-07-13 05:00
    이벤트가 있을 때 실험을 피해야 할 것인가? 그대로 진행하는 것이 좋은 것인가?
  • Issue#5be-favorite2024-07-13 04:58
    표본 크기와 실험기간을 결정해본 경험에 대해
  • Issue comment#4be-favorite2024-07-13 04:58
    장기 지표 설정의 어려움 및 설계 방법론 논의
  • Issue#4be-favorite2024-07-13 04:58
    장기 지표 설정의 어려움 및 설계 방법론 논의
  • Issue comment#6hyejahaha2024-04-27 06:47
    이벤트가 있을 때 실험을 피해야 할 것인가? 그대로 진행하는 것이 좋은 것인가?
  • Issue comment#7hyejahaha2024-04-27 06:27
    목표 지표와 가드레일지표의 밸런스 - Case Study
  • Issue#6ddongmiin2024-04-07 15:47
    이벤트가 있을 때 실험을 피해야 할 것인가? 그대로 진행하는 것이 좋은 것인가?
  • Issue#5ddongmiin2024-04-07 15:42
    표본 크기와 실험기간을 결정해본 경험에 대해
  • Issue#1knit-factory2024-04-02 04:48
    적정 표본 크기(Sample Size)에 대한 논의 - 너무 큰 표본 크기에 대하여

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 37 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.