Skip to content

Cloud Native Artifacial Intelligence Model Format Specification

active 2025-01-302025-06-17 (UTC)

Partial coverage11,947 / 13,404 hourly files (89%) · 2 absent upstream · 1,454 failed, retryable2025-01-292026-08-10 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
178
Pushes
14
Pull requests
26
Issues
5
Stars
25
Forks
5

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 139 days from 2025-01-30 to 2025-06-17. Pushes: 14 total, peak 3 in a day. Pull requests: 26 total, peak 3 in a day. Issues: 5 total, peak 3 in a day. Comments: 50 total, peak 6 in a day. Stars: 25 total, peak 3 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
aftersnow25347
gaius-qi23463
caozhuozi220612
bergwolf17226
chlins15351
gorkem9125
gemini-code-assist[bot]7005
amisevsk5004
sudo-bmitch4004
sabre10413001
BraveY2110
tianon2002
CormickKneey1000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Pull request#67caozhuozi2025-06-17 03:36
  • Issue comment#60amisevsk2025-06-16 15:14
    Enhance Model Spec to Distinguish Between Base Model and LoRA Adaptor Components
  • Pull request#65caozhuozi2025-06-16 13:17
  • Pull request#64caozhuozi2025-06-16 12:34
  • Pull request#61chlins2025-06-13 10:22
  • Issue comment#60gaius-qi2025-06-13 08:52
    Enhance Model Spec to Distinguish Between Base Model and LoRA Adaptor Components
  • Issue comment#60aftersnow2025-06-13 03:05
    Enhance Model Spec to Distinguish Between Base Model and LoRA Adaptor Components
  • Pull request#59BraveY2025-06-13 02:11
  • Issue#60CormickKneey2025-06-12 15:06
    Enhance Model Spec to Distinguish Between Base Model and LoRA Adaptor Components
  • Pull request#57aftersnow2025-06-12 02:45
  • Pull request#48bergwolf2025-06-12 02:44
  • Issue comment#54tianon2025-06-09 18:02
    is it really necessary to have `application/vnd.cnai.model.doc.v1.raw` or `application/vnd.cnai.model.code.v1.raw`?
  • Issue comment#58amisevsk2025-06-09 14:57
    Consider using the `org.opencontainers.image.title` to define filename for binary layer files
  • Issue comment#58amisevsk2025-06-09 14:56
    Consider using the `org.opencontainers.image.title` to define filename for binary layer files
  • Issue comment#58aftersnow2025-06-09 09:27
    Consider using the `org.opencontainers.image.title` to define filename for binary layer files
  • Pull request#56aftersnow2025-06-09 08:04
  • Pull request#59aftersnow2025-06-09 07:54
  • Issue comment#54gorkem2025-06-09 00:45
    is it really necessary to have `application/vnd.cnai.model.doc.v1.raw` or `application/vnd.cnai.model.code.v1.raw`?
  • Issue comment#54sudo-bmitch2025-06-08 23:56
    is it really necessary to have `application/vnd.cnai.model.doc.v1.raw` or `application/vnd.cnai.model.code.v1.raw`?
  • Issue comment#54gorkem2025-06-06 18:05
    is it really necessary to have `application/vnd.cnai.model.doc.v1.raw` or `application/vnd.cnai.model.code.v1.raw`?
  • Issue comment#54gorkem2025-06-06 17:28
    is it really necessary to have `application/vnd.cnai.model.doc.v1.raw` or `application/vnd.cnai.model.code.v1.raw`?
  • Issue comment#54tianon2025-06-05 19:22
    is it really necessary to have `application/vnd.cnai.model.doc.v1.raw` or `application/vnd.cnai.model.code.v1.raw`?
  • Issue comment#54sudo-bmitch2025-06-05 17:00
    is it really necessary to have `application/vnd.cnai.model.doc.v1.raw` or `application/vnd.cnai.model.code.v1.raw`?
  • Issue comment#54gorkem2025-06-05 14:30
    is it really necessary to have `application/vnd.cnai.model.doc.v1.raw` or `application/vnd.cnai.model.code.v1.raw`?
  • Pull request#57gorkem2025-06-02 10:47

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 25 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.