Modeling framework representations for ASKEM
active 2023-08-15 → 2025-04-30 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 625 days from 2023-08-15 to 2025-04-30. Pushes: 69 total, peak 6 in a day. Pull requests: 39 total, peak 8 in a day. Issues: 15 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 82 total, peak 11 in a day. Stars: 0 total, peak 0 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| jpfairbanks | 55 | 9 | 4 | 24 |
| fivegrant | 40 | 10 | 3 | 17 |
| bgyori | 33 | 7 | 7 | 12 |
| JosephCottam | 20 | 3 | 10 | 4 |
| danbryce | 15 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| liunelson | 15 | 10 | 2 | 2 |
| github-actions[bot] | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| SamWitty | 11 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| djinnome | 11 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| olynch | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| sabinala | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| brandomr | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| jClugstor | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| mattprintz | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| lukem12345 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| YohannParis | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| cthoyt | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| enoriega | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| dgauldie | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue#69dgauldie2024-06-04 17:30Create full example of proposed updated decapodes AMR based off of Luke's Grigoriev ice cap example
- Pull request#90JosephCottam2024-03-20 22:51
- Issue#88JosephCottam2024-02-16 23:11On second thought, i think its because 3.10 == 3.1 in numbers BUT we really mean a semantic version. So it matters and '3.10' is correct. To be consistent, I think the other two could be put in quotes.
- Pull request#89JosephCottam2024-02-16 23:11
- Issue comment#77djinnome2024-02-16 23:06PDE Petrinet models
- Pull request#89djinnome2024-02-16 22:53
- Issue#88djinnome2024-02-16 22:51On second thought, i think its because 3.10 == 3.1 in numbers BUT we really mean a semantic version. So it matters and '3.10' is correct. To be consistent, I think the other two could be put in quotes.
- ReleaseJosephCottam2024-02-16 22:44ModelInventory_v0.2
- Pull request#87djinnome2024-02-16 22:28
- Pull request#87JosephCottam2024-02-16 22:06
- Pull request#86JosephCottam2024-02-16 22:05
- Pull request#86JosephCottam2024-02-16 21:37
- Issue comment#85JosephCottam2024-02-16 21:35Python 3.8 compatibility
- Pull request#85JosephCottam2024-02-16 21:35
- Pull request#85JosephCottam2024-02-16 21:21
- ReleaseJosephCottam2024-02-15 21:58ModelInventory_v0.2
- Pull request#84JosephCottam2024-02-14 22:03
- Issue comment#82lukem123452024-01-31 19:00Grigoriev example is out of sync with spec
- Pull request#83lukem123452024-01-31 18:57
- Issue comment#82fivegrant2024-01-31 16:18Grigoriev example is out of sync with spec
- Issue comment#82lukem123452024-01-31 16:05Grigoriev example is out of sync with spec
- Issue comment#82fivegrant2024-01-30 20:05Grigoriev example is out of sync with spec
- Issue#82fivegrant2024-01-30 18:47Grigoriev example is out of sync with spec
- Issue#80jpfairbanks2024-01-30 18:39InterTypes for Configuration and Context got lost in Merge conflicts.
- Pull request#81jpfairbanks2024-01-30 18:39
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 0 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.