DMTF's Reference Implementation of SPDM
active 2023-08-15 → 2026-08-17 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 1099 days from 2023-08-15 to 2026-08-17. Pushes: 960 total, peak 9 in a day. Pull requests: 1,055 total, peak 12 in a day. Issues: 856 total, peak 12 in a day. Comments: 2,482 total, peak 22 in a day. Stars: 98 total, peak 2 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| steven-bellock | 2.2K | 140 | 357 | 949 |
| jyao1 | 2.2K | 376 | 409 | 615 |
| github-actions[bot] | 444 | 444 | 0 | 0 |
| Wenxing-hou | 432 | 0 | 61 | 197 |
| Li-Aaron | 118 | 0 | 38 | 51 |
| twilfredo | 118 | 0 | 15 | 67 |
| ShitalJumbad | 104 | 0 | 15 | 45 |
| alistair23 | 98 | 0 | 16 | 56 |
| Xiaohanjlll | 90 | 0 | 50 | 25 |
| Zhiqiang520 | 87 | 0 | 4 | 34 |
| richkong88 | 81 | 0 | 12 | 42 |
| rw8896 | 66 | 0 | 1 | 29 |
| PrakashK94 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 27 |
| uvinrg | 56 | 0 | 6 | 31 |
| PrithviAPai | 55 | 0 | 1 | 39 |
| manojkiraneda | 45 | 0 | 10 | 17 |
| goutham23 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
| mcsmonk | 37 | 0 | 2 | 11 |
| alexteoh-intel | 28 | 0 | 9 | 14 |
| xiaoyuruan | 20 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Pull request#3676naruto-lgtm2026-07-01 09:23
- Issue#3185steven-bellock2026-06-13 20:13Need to add (asym_algo != 0) check if (SPDM_GET_CAPABILITIES_RESPONSE_FLAGS_EP_INFO_CAP_SIG != 0), in ALGORITHM function
- Issue#3636jyao12026-06-11 01:40revisit multi-key and add sample to ensure it works.
- Issue#3645jyao12026-06-06 03:42No path produces the "Exists with key" slot state
- Issue#3639jyao12026-06-05 13:07Add DSP0277 version 1.3
- Issue comment#3633jyao12026-06-04 03:13Question about FINISH signature transcript in SPDM 1.4 vs libspdm implementation
- Issue comment#3628jyao12026-05-28 07:04mbedtls/pqc: gate IPPCP ML-KEM by ARCH and harden NASM CI
- Issue#3625jyao12026-05-20 03:17need to update libspdm_macro_check.h with PQC algo
- Issue comment#3609jyao12026-05-20 02:22Debug Output for Measurement Verification
- Issue#3624jyao12026-05-20 02:21need support chunk Capability
- Pull request#3621czwolak2026-05-11 15:55
- Issue comment#3619jyao12026-05-06 00:57SM2 Key Exchange Support
- Issue#1277PrakashK942026-05-04 05:17Can LBSPDM allows us to validate only root and leaf certificate in certificate chain?
- Issue comment#3604jyao12026-04-27 08:01Specify attribution for AI "assistants"
- Pull request#3614alistair232026-04-27 00:21
- Issue#3593jyao12026-04-25 00:41GET_KEY_PAIR_INFO/KEY_PAIR_INFO (SPDM 1.4): Oversized PQC Length Fields Are Truncated Instead of Rejected
- Issue comment#3610jyao12026-04-24 05:51libspdm_rsp_algorithms: Add a callback on successfull negotiation
- Issue#3593jyao12026-04-23 05:32GET_KEY_PAIR_INFO/KEY_PAIR_INFO (SPDM 1.4): Oversized PQC Length Fields Are Truncated Instead of Rejected
- Issue#3598jyao12026-04-23 05:31CHUNK_GET/CHUNK_RESPONSE Missing Explicit Requester Handle Correlation Check (param2)
- Issue#3416jyao12026-04-15 02:53TCBInfo format issue
- Pull request#3583xiaoyuruan2026-04-15 02:53
- Issue#3557jyao12026-04-14 23:31Intermittent failure in `spdm_crypt_lib_tests`
- Pull request#3603jyao12026-04-14 23:31
- Issue comment#3597jyao12026-04-14 05:32PSK_FINISH/PSK_FINISH_RSP Missing Explicit Responder Max-Bound Check for SPDM 1.4 Request Opaque Length
- Issue comment#3592jyao12026-04-13 02:19PSK_FINISH/PSK_FINISH_RSP (SPDM 1.4): Opaque-Length Validation and Response Completeness Gaps
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 98 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.