Skip to content

This repository is the official code source of PPFlow: Target-Aware Peptide Design with Torsional Flow Matching (ICML2024)

active 2024-06-142025-12-29 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,439 / 26,439 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-20 (UTC)
Events
182
Pushes
30
Pull requests
2
Issues
17
Stars
91
Forks
12

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 564 days from 2024-06-14 to 2025-12-29. Pushes: 30 total, peak 6 in a day. Pull requests: 2 total, peak 2 in a day. Issues: 17 total, peak 3 in a day. Comments: 30 total, peak 4 in a day. Stars: 91 total, peak 5 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
EDAPINENUT5630118
lalalalala-ai9007
BL-Lac1495978709004
Guo-Stone2001
jdp221000
ValMystletainn1010
GajulapalliNagaVyshnavi1000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#10EDAPINENUT2025-03-10 11:55
    Hi, Actually I was trying to get the pre-trained model from the drive , but it says 404 error and and .pt files are unavailable there , could you please update me with this !
  • Issue#10GajulapalliNagaVyshnavi2025-03-10 10:26
    Hi, Actually I was trying to get the pre-trained model from the drive , but it says 404 error and and .pt files are unavailable there , could you please update me with this !
  • Pull request#9EDAPINENUT2025-01-09 06:48
  • Pull request#9ValMystletainn2025-01-09 03:00
  • Issue comment#8EDAPINENUT2024-12-17 14:24
    About the dataset
  • Issue#7EDAPINENUT2024-12-10 15:45
    Device problems.
  • Issue#4EDAPINENUT2024-12-10 15:45
    Mismatch in Arguments for eps_net and Issues with Test Results Reproduction
  • Issue comment#4EDAPINENUT2024-12-09 11:47
    Mismatch in Arguments for eps_net and Issues with Test Results Reproduction
  • Issue comment#4EDAPINENUT2024-11-05 00:40
    Mismatch in Arguments for eps_net and Issues with Test Results Reproduction
  • Issue comment#4lalalalala-ai2024-11-04 19:04
    Mismatch in Arguments for eps_net and Issues with Test Results Reproduction
  • Issue comment#7EDAPINENUT2024-10-29 05:49
    Device problems.
  • Issue#7jdp222024-10-29 02:34
    Device problems.
  • Issue comment#4EDAPINENUT2024-10-10 10:39
    Mismatch in Arguments for eps_net and Issues with Test Results Reproduction
  • Issue#5EDAPINENUT2024-10-09 01:48
    Bugs for implementation
  • Issue#6EDAPINENUT2024-09-30 07:17
    Question about the \delta G evaluation
  • Issue comment#6Guo-Stone2024-09-28 13:56
    Question about the \delta G evaluation
  • Issue comment#6EDAPINENUT2024-09-28 13:50
    Question about the \delta G evaluation
  • Issue#6Guo-Stone2024-09-28 13:22
    Question about the \delta G evaluation
  • Issue comment#4EDAPINENUT2024-09-25 12:02
    Mismatch in Arguments for eps_net and Issues with Test Results Reproduction
  • Issue comment#4EDAPINENUT2024-09-25 08:55
    Mismatch in Arguments for eps_net and Issues with Test Results Reproduction
  • Issue comment#5EDAPINENUT2024-09-25 05:28
    Bugs for implementation
  • Issue comment#5lalalalala-ai2024-09-25 04:09
    Bugs for implementation
  • Issue comment#5lalalalala-ai2024-09-24 18:23
    Bugs for implementation
  • Issue comment#5lalalalala-ai2024-09-24 16:35
    Bugs for implementation
  • Issue comment#4BL-Lac1495978702024-09-24 15:38
    Mismatch in Arguments for eps_net and Issues with Test Results Reproduction

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 91 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.