Skip to content

fork anysplat

Python · active 2025-07-252026-05-27 (UTC)

Partial coverage11,652 / 12,827 hourly files (91%) · 2 absent upstream · 1,171 failed, retryable2025-02-222026-08-10 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
346
Pushes
2
Pull requests
2
Issues
45
Stars
209
Forks
14

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 308 days from 2025-07-24 to 2026-05-27. Pushes: 2 total, peak 1 in a day. Pull requests: 2 total, peak 1 in a day. Issues: 45 total, peak 5 in a day. Comments: 74 total, peak 5 in a day. Stars: 209 total, peak 5 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
jianglh-WHU262117
uJunLI11005
myc6348008
victkk5002
Alex417ii4002
dsvilarkovic4002
LiuChunlin-eng4003
ckrsls4003
ustcjasonliu4011
ricshaw3002
ruiqi-nju3000
SanMumumu3003
Vinayak-VG3001
Giperx3003
dev111ce2002
JamChaos2000
207132002
michaelcukier2000
LIUZhening1112002
peizhou991001

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#89LiuChunlin-eng2026-03-03 12:13
    overfit to context views
  • Issue comment#88myc6342026-03-03 07:27
    after about 1000 training steps, training loss continues to rise
  • Issue comment#98myc6342026-03-03 07:18
    Strange result when running inference.py
  • Issue comment#101myc6342026-03-03 07:14
    Question about 16-View Sampling in Mip-NeRF360 Experiments
  • Issue comment#93XLR-man2026-03-02 13:51
    How to evaluate AnySplat on datasets such as LLFF and MipNerf360?
  • Issue comment#51lee-vv2026-02-26 07:00
    Discrepancy and Artifacts in Exported .ply vs. RGB Video
  • Issue#100comedy09132026-02-12 14:14
    Question about CO3DV2 Preprocessing
  • Issue#99JamChaos2026-02-11 07:43
    Model parameters become NaN during training
  • Issue#98hu8592026-02-06 14:16
    Strange result when running inference.py
  • Issue#97LeiF-u2026-02-06 08:31
    A small question about the simple_trainer
  • Issue comment#96207132026-02-06 08:10
    What effective batch size was used for training?
  • Issue comment#77207132026-01-28 11:49
    Question about training on original DL3DV dataset with AnySplat
  • Issue comment#93sailor-z2026-01-21 08:10
    How to evaluate AnySplat on datasets such as LLFF and MipNerf360?
  • Issue comment#89Alex417ii2026-01-10 06:35
    overfit to context views
  • Issue comment#60Alex417ii2026-01-09 08:43
    High Training PSNR but Low Validation PSNR and Color Errors in Rendered Images
  • Issue#91JamChaos2026-01-06 11:41
    Validation scenes exhibit low PSNR
  • Issue comment#50LiuChunlin-eng2025-12-27 11:27
    Question about training loss behavior on small DL3DV subsets
  • Issue#89LiuChunlin-eng2025-12-27 10:37
    overfit to context views
  • Issue#88Alex417ii2025-12-24 08:59
    after about 1000 training steps, training loss continues to rise
  • Issue#86Alex417ii2025-12-22 06:06
    gets killed and interrupts halfway through
  • Issue comment#85LiuChunlin-eng2025-12-13 02:18
    Camera Pose Estimation
  • Issue comment#40Jaykumaran2025-12-11 10:43
    installation problem
  • Issue comment#46Livioni2025-12-02 14:27
    Nan when training
  • Issue#83bkxmw2025-12-02 04:20
    Higher than Expected LPIPS Metrics When Reproducing Table 1 Results with AnySplat Weights on VRNerf Dataset
  • Issue comment#16Nole212025-12-01 08:38
    About evaluation

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 209 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.