Skip to content

Transformer for One-Stop Interpretable Cell-type Annotation test

active 2023-08-242025-09-05 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,380 / 26,380 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-18 (UTC)
Events
128
Pushes
1
Pull requests
2
Issues
8
Stars
69
Forks
20

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 744 days from 2023-08-24 to 2025-09-05. Pushes: 1 total, peak 1 in a day. Pull requests: 2 total, peak 1 in a day. Issues: 8 total, peak 1 in a day. Comments: 28 total, peak 6 in a day. Stars: 69 total, peak 3 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
JiaweiChenGo141013
lifan20224004
IvyYang003003
rushrush20222010
Xxi-GitHub2001
DingMaolinBio2001
zclecle21001
kk5kk1000
yujn9991000
GlancerZ1001
sldyns1010
Yutong181001
fw021441000
Pinolinoo1000
warming1511001
WhatMelonGua1000
niklasbinder1001
SteGruener1001

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#21lifan20222025-01-15 07:17
    The test data runs differently than the example
  • Issue comment#21lifan20222025-01-15 07:12
    The test data runs differently than the example
  • Issue comment#23Xxi-GitHub2024-09-01 22:09
    Script problem
  • Issue#23Xxi-GitHub2024-09-01 18:25
    Script problem
  • Issue comment#21JiaweiChenGo2024-06-20 09:39
    The test data runs differently than the example
  • Issue comment#21JiaweiChenGo2024-06-20 09:30
    The test data runs differently than the example
  • Issue comment#21JiaweiChenGo2024-06-20 09:20
    The test data runs differently than the example
  • Issue comment#22JiaweiChenGo2024-06-20 08:25
    Mask matrix issues
  • Issue comment#21warming1512024-06-19 22:12
    The test data runs differently than the example
  • Issue#14WhatMelonGua2024-05-31 05:46
    Problem with TOSICA metrics comparing
  • Issue comment#19IvyYang002024-05-25 12:24
    TOSICA pre function gives very different accuracy than evaluate in train function
  • Issue comment#21IvyYang002024-05-24 11:19
    The test data runs differently than the example
  • Issue comment#21IvyYang002024-05-24 08:00
    The test data runs differently than the example
  • Issue#22kk5kk2024-04-07 12:42
    Mask matrix issues
  • Issue comment#21lifan20222024-03-27 02:35
    The test data runs differently than the example
  • Issue comment#21lifan20222024-03-20 13:20
    The test data runs differently than the example
  • Issue comment#19JiaweiChenGo2024-03-04 06:55
    TOSICA pre function gives very different accuracy than evaluate in train function
  • Issue comment#13JiaweiChenGo2024-03-04 06:52
    use TOSICA for cell classification
  • Issue comment#15JiaweiChenGo2024-03-04 06:25
    Cannot import TOSICA due to issue with np.long
  • Issue comment#16JiaweiChenGo2024-03-04 06:12
    Memory leakage
  • Issue comment#17JiaweiChenGo2024-03-04 06:07
    Data preprocessing
  • Issue comment#18JiaweiChenGo2024-03-04 06:03
    Code Consulting
  • Issue comment#13SteGruener2024-03-01 09:57
    use TOSICA for cell classification
  • Issue#10rushrush20222023-12-26 14:13
    model depth=2, cause more 8 times GPU usage than depth=1 in hPancreas dataset train
  • Issue comment#13zclecle22023-11-30 13:37
    use TOSICA for cell classification

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 69 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.