[ICRA2024] RaTrack: Moving Object Detection and Tracking with 4D Radar Point Cloud
active 2024-03-13 → 2026-03-31 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 749 days from 2024-03-13 to 2026-03-31. Pushes: 24 total, peak 8 in a day. Pull requests: 8 total, peak 2 in a day. Issues: 28 total, peak 3 in a day. Comments: 33 total, peak 16 in a day. Stars: 184 total, peak 6 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MrTooOldDriver | 35 | 13 | 3 | 11 |
| LJacksonPan | 18 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| LiawWun | 16 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Toytiny | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| altfrog | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| geun0196 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| zlzheshi | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| SupunDevendra | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GoldenCaterpie | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| eggman-1024 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| mojingyue521 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| zkp0113 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| M-Hammod | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| HH918636 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| marcocrowe | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue#23zkp01132025-09-01 12:38Question about the main_utils.py .
- Issue#22buluscheng2025-07-24 03:13Question about model weights
- Issue comment#21xcc27315942025-07-24 03:04有没有权重
- Issue comment#14zlzheshi2025-05-20 05:52Some updates on RaTrack codebase are on the way
- Issue#20HH9186362025-04-08 14:35Inquiry Regarding RaTrack Evaluation Metrics Implementation and Format Adaptation
- Issue comment#17zlzheshi2025-03-29 08:37Question about result visualization
- Issue#18LJacksonPan2024-10-12 11:38Replication Recommendations
- Issue#19LJacksonPan2024-10-12 11:37Replication Recommendations
- Issue#18LJacksonPan2024-10-12 11:25Replication Recommendations
- Issue#17geun01962024-09-09 09:56Question about result visualization
- Issue comment#15LiawWun2024-09-06 12:10Is the MOTA calculated in traditonal method?
- Issue#16eggman-10242024-09-05 06:42Hi, how can I get the result like this?
- Issue#16eggman-10242024-09-05 04:59Hi, how can I get the result like this?
- Issue comment#15altfrog2024-09-03 13:55Is the MOTA calculated in traditonal method?
- Issue#15altfrog2024-09-03 13:30Is the MOTA calculated in traditonal method?
- Issue#13LJacksonPan2024-08-31 09:14Thank you for your prompt response. I have used the suggested code and made modifications based on the following suggestions. I successfully ran the evaluation code, but the MOTA value is still negative.
- Issue#14MrTooOldDriver2024-08-30 12:00Some updates on RaTrack codebase are on the way
- Issue comment#13LiawWun2024-08-28 00:05Thank you for your prompt response. I have used the suggested code and made modifications based on the following suggestions. I successfully ran the evaluation code, but the MOTA value is still negative.
- Issue comment#13LiawWun2024-08-28 00:00Thank you for your prompt response. I have used the suggested code and made modifications based on the following suggestions. I successfully ran the evaluation code, but the MOTA value is still negative.
- Issue comment#13LiawWun2024-08-27 23:59Thank you for your prompt response. I have used the suggested code and made modifications based on the following suggestions. I successfully ran the evaluation code, but the MOTA value is still negative.
- Issue comment#13MrTooOldDriver2024-08-27 23:54Thank you for your prompt response. I have used the suggested code and made modifications based on the following suggestions. I successfully ran the evaluation code, but the MOTA value is still negative.
- Issue comment#13LiawWun2024-08-27 23:44Thank you for your prompt response. I have used the suggested code and made modifications based on the following suggestions. I successfully ran the evaluation code, but the MOTA value is still negative.
- Issue comment#13LiawWun2024-08-27 23:36Thank you for your prompt response. I have used the suggested code and made modifications based on the following suggestions. I successfully ran the evaluation code, but the MOTA value is still negative.
- Issue comment#13MrTooOldDriver2024-08-27 23:32Thank you for your prompt response. I have used the suggested code and made modifications based on the following suggestions. I successfully ran the evaluation code, but the MOTA value is still negative.
- Issue comment#13LiawWun2024-08-27 23:30Thank you for your prompt response. I have used the suggested code and made modifications based on the following suggestions. I successfully ran the evaluation code, but the MOTA value is still negative.
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 184 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.