Skip to content

Fast Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) implementation of the prerank algorithm. Use Loess interpolation of bimodal ES distribution for accurate p-value estimation.

active 2023-08-182026-05-26 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,592 / 26,592 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-26 (UTC)
Events
143
Pushes
26
Pull requests
3
Issues
31
Stars
25
Forks
3

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 1013 days from 2023-08-18 to 2026-05-26. Pushes: 26 total, peak 4 in a day. Pull requests: 3 total, peak 1 in a day. Issues: 31 total, peak 7 in a day. Comments: 52 total, peak 7 in a day. Stars: 25 total, peak 1 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
lachmann127225132
robinpaul8510005
yihming6004
stevendbrown6024
Zethson5004
josephpowi3001
polrus2000
votti2002
terynin1000
a-bird281000
tom-gome1000
u8sand1100
bli251000
chienhsiang1000
jacqueline-alector1000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue#42terynin2025-10-17 17:08
    ZeroDivisionError with small signature sets (<100)
  • Issue#41robinpaul852025-05-27 21:45
    Gene set size?
  • Issue comment#40lachmann122025-05-16 21:55
    Non reproducible run time error from scipy
  • Issue#40robinpaul852025-05-16 21:28
    Non reproducible run time error from scipy
  • Issue#39josephpowi2025-04-17 13:54
    ValueError: The function value at x=-1351079888211148.8 is NaN; solver cannot continue.
  • Issue comment#39josephpowi2025-04-16 16:49
    ValueError: The function value at x=-1351079888211148.8 is NaN; solver cannot continue.
  • Issue comment#39lachmann122025-04-16 15:37
    ValueError: The function value at x=-1351079888211148.8 is NaN; solver cannot continue.
  • Issue#39josephpowi2025-04-15 21:59
    ValueError: The function value at x=-1351079888211148.8 is NaN; solver cannot continue.
  • Issue#38lachmann122025-03-24 13:59
    Seed type error in gsea
  • Releaselachmann122025-03-24 13:58
    1.3.49 - stable
  • Issue comment#38lachmann122025-02-25 20:35
    Seed type error in gsea
  • Issue#38a-bird282025-02-25 17:28
    Seed type error in gsea
  • Issue comment#36lachmann122025-02-24 20:24
    Normalized enrichment score = negative infinity and results not reproducible across different computers
  • Issue comment#36lachmann122025-02-12 16:37
    Normalized enrichment score = negative infinity and results not reproducible across different computers
  • Issue comment#36lachmann122025-02-12 16:32
    Normalized enrichment score = negative infinity and results not reproducible across different computers
  • Issue comment#36robinpaul852025-02-04 21:57
    Normalized enrichment score = negative infinity and results not reproducible across different computers
  • Issue comment#37stevendbrown2025-01-03 19:46
    use NumPy RandomState object for shuffling in get_peak_size_adv
  • Pull request#37stevendbrown2025-01-03 19:46
  • Issue comment#36stevendbrown2025-01-03 19:45
    Normalized enrichment score = negative infinity and results not reproducible across different computers
  • Issue comment#37stevendbrown2025-01-03 18:57
    use NumPy RandomState object for shuffling in get_peak_size_adv
  • Pull request#37stevendbrown2024-12-30 20:55
  • Issue comment#36stevendbrown2024-12-19 17:03
    Normalized enrichment score = negative infinity and results not reproducible across different computers
  • Issue comment#36robinpaul852024-11-01 21:39
    Normalized enrichment score = negative infinity and results not reproducible across different computers
  • Issue comment#36lachmann122024-10-22 20:25
    Normalized enrichment score = negative infinity and results not reproducible across different computers
  • Issue comment#36lachmann122024-10-22 20:25
    Normalized enrichment score = negative infinity and results not reproducible across different computers

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 25 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.