Skip to content

NeuralCollapseApplications/FSCIL

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

[ICLR 2023] The official code for our ICLR 2023 (top25%) paper: "Neural Collapse Inspired Feature-Classifier Alignment for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning"

active 2023-08-202026-02-18 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,344 / 26,344 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-16 (UTC)
Events
58
Pushes
0
Pull requests
0
Issues
6
Stars
44
Forks
3

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 914 days from 2023-08-20 to 2026-02-18. Pushes: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 6 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 5 total, peak 1 in a day. Stars: 44 total, peak 1 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
HarborYuan5003
WangYJ-WYJ2001
lzwqjh1000
Bot-zeh1001
9631413771000
MadadamXie1000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue#10MadadamXie2025-01-01 16:28
    How to run the code without distribution wrapper? I tried several times, follows are my bash script,
  • Issue comment#9HarborYuan2024-11-09 08:09
    How to use it without docker?
  • Issue#99631413772024-11-09 08:05
    How to use it without docker?
  • Issue#7HarborYuan2024-01-22 03:32
    I've observed a difference in my results. Could you please help me understand the reason behind this discrepancy
  • Issue#8HarborYuan2024-01-22 03:32
    I cannot reproduce the training results on the CIFAR100 dataset, especially in the last few incremental sessions.
  • Issue comment#8HarborYuan2023-12-24 08:51
    I cannot reproduce the training results on the CIFAR100 dataset, especially in the last few incremental sessions.
  • Issue comment#7WangYJ-WYJ2023-12-20 13:58
    I've observed a difference in my results. Could you please help me understand the reason behind this discrepancy
  • Issue#8lzwqjh2023-12-19 03:30
    I cannot reproduce the training results on the CIFAR100 dataset, especially in the last few incremental sessions.
  • Issue comment#7Bot-zeh2023-12-18 08:22
    I've observed a difference in my results. Could you please help me understand the reason behind this discrepancy
  • Issue comment#7HarborYuan2023-12-13 14:12
    I've observed a difference in my results. Could you please help me understand the reason behind this discrepancy
  • Issue#7WangYJ-WYJ2023-12-13 09:09
    I've observed a difference in my results. Could you please help me understand the reason behind this discrepancy

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 44 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.