Skip to content

[ICLR2024 spotlight] OmniQuant is a simple and powerful quantization technique for LLMs.

active 2024-07-292026-06-07 (UTC)

Partial coverage14,714 / 17,902 hourly files (82%) · 2 absent upstream · 3,187 failed, retryable2024-07-262026-08-11 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
212
Pushes
1
Pull requests
1
Issues
14
Stars
156
Forks
16

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 679 days from 2024-07-29 to 2026-06-07. Pushes: 1 total, peak 1 in a day. Pull requests: 1 total, peak 1 in a day. Issues: 14 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 24 total, peak 3 in a day. Stars: 156 total, peak 8 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#114Tfloow2026-04-11 11:48
    update: support new Llama API + assess OpenGVLab/OmniQuant#113
  • Issue comment#110jiuyixu252026-01-16 01:07
    ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'auto_gptq'
  • Issue#110jiuyixu252026-01-16 00:28
    ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'auto_gptq'
  • Issue#109yz3022025-12-16 02:48
    Can omniquant be used on CNN models, similar to YOLO?
  • Pull request#108TokuyuSou2025-09-17 07:40
  • Issue comment#97B0B8K1ng2025-08-14 11:59
    Add support for Llama3.1
  • Issue#106JustVelkhana2025-06-21 05:41
    A single A100-80G can't run Llama-2-70b model?
  • Issue comment#70threeEggPie2025-04-17 06:28
    W4A4 in llama2-7b
  • Issue#105forcekkk2025-04-11 05:30
    RuntimeError: Expected all tensors to be on the same device, but found at least two devices, cuda:7 and cuda:0! (when checking argument for argument index in method wrapper_CUDA__index_select)
  • Issue comment#89forcekkk2025-04-11 04:27
    RuntimeError: Expected all tensors to be on the same device, but found at least two devices, cpu and cuda:0! (when checking argument for argument mat2 in method wrapper_CUDA_bmm)
  • Issue comment#89forcekkk2025-04-11 04:17
    RuntimeError: Expected all tensors to be on the same device, but found at least two devices, cpu and cuda:0! (when checking argument for argument mat2 in method wrapper_CUDA_bmm)
  • Issue comment#93luo13zhi2025-02-22 09:15
    The llama-2-7b model can't quant in this code
  • Issue comment#104mostafaelhoushi2025-01-26 05:13
    I encounter a error: "AttributeError: 'LlamaAttention' object has no attribute 'rotary_emb'",when i run code with llama-1-7b. It happened in int_llama_layer.py: self.rotary_emb = copy.deepcopy(org_module.rotary_emb)
  • Issue comment#103mostafaelhoushi2025-01-26 05:13
    I encounter a error: "AttributeError: 'LlamaAttention' object has no attribute 'rotary_emb'",when i run code with llama-1-7b.
  • Issue comment#104trinks-slam8182025-01-05 05:04
    I encounter a error: "AttributeError: 'LlamaAttention' object has no attribute 'rotary_emb'",when i run code with llama-1-7b. It happened in int_llama_layer.py: self.rotary_emb = copy.deepcopy(org_module.rotary_emb)
  • Issue#104WX-yh2025-01-05 04:58
    I encounter a error: "AttributeError: 'LlamaAttention' object has no attribute 'rotary_emb'",when i run code with llama-1-7b. It happened in int_llama_layer.py: self.rotary_emb = copy.deepcopy(org_module.rotary_emb)
  • Issue#103WX-yh2025-01-05 04:54
    I encounter a error: "AttributeError: 'LlamaAttention' object has no attribute 'rotary_emb'",when i run code with llama-1-7b.
  • Issue comment#102stackByStack2024-12-16 04:06
    Fail to reproduce the result of w2a16 using llama2 7b
  • Issue#102stackByStack2024-12-16 04:02
    Fail to reproduce the result of w2a16 using llama2 7b
  • Issue comment#101ChenMnZ2024-11-21 00:33
    Will the qwen2.5 model be supported in the future?
  • Issue comment#100ChenMnZ2024-11-21 00:30
    OmniQuant belong to PTQ or QAT?
  • Issue#94ChenMnZ2024-11-01 01:34
    Performance gap with Llama-2-7B
  • Issue comment#81SherrySwift2024-10-31 06:22
    Questions about quantization
  • Issue comment#8Wotoosh2024-10-12 15:22
    why quantize opt-1.3b or llama 7b with W8A8 config loss is nan?
  • Issue comment#8ChenMnZ2024-10-12 14:27
    why quantize opt-1.3b or llama 7b with W8A8 config loss is nan?

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 156 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.