Skip to content

OpenGeoMetadata/metadata-issues

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

active 2024-05-102026-01-26 (UTC)

Partial coverage17,052 / 21,753 hourly files (78%) · 2 absent upstream · 4,700 failed, retryable2024-02-172026-08-12 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
30
Pushes
0
Pull requests
0
Issues
11
Stars
0
Forks
0

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 627 days from 2024-05-10 to 2026-01-26. Pushes: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 11 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 19 total, peak 5 in a day. Stars: 0 total, peak 0 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
karenmajewicz7003
kgjenkins6004
thatbudakguy4001
rmseifried4003

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue#68thatbudakguy2026-01-26 18:13
    Proposal: rename the dct_references_s field to avoid indexing issues in Solr
  • Issue#68thatbudakguy2025-07-28 22:41
    Rename the dct_references_s field to avoid indexing issues in Solr
  • Issue comment#47rmseifried2025-07-25 19:55
    Create a validation file to check if record meets GBL community standards
  • Issue comment#24rmseifried2025-07-25 19:49
    Do a review of the Obligations for each field
  • Issue comment#64karenmajewicz2025-07-25 19:40
    Add reference URI for IIIF Annotations
  • Issue#64karenmajewicz2025-07-25 19:40
    Add reference URI for IIIF Annotations
  • Issue#62karenmajewicz2025-07-25 19:37
    Clean up visual presentation of Aardvark field list
  • Issue comment#63karenmajewicz2025-07-25 17:57
    New proposal: add a plain text field analogous to isPartOf in GBL 1.0
  • Issue comment#24rmseifried2025-07-25 17:17
    Do a review of the Obligations for each field
  • Issue comment#24karenmajewicz2025-07-24 17:59
    Do a review of the Obligations for each field
  • Issue comment#24karenmajewicz2025-07-24 16:34
    Do a review of the Obligations for each field
  • Issue comment#24rmseifried2025-07-22 20:18
    Do a review of the Obligations for each field
  • Issue comment#66karenmajewicz2025-07-22 19:28
    Proposal: front/back COG images for scanned maps
  • Issue comment#66karenmajewicz2025-07-22 18:08
    Proposal: front/back COG images for scanned maps
  • Issue comment#66kgjenkins2025-07-21 19:54
    Proposal: front/back COG images for scanned maps
  • Issue comment#66thatbudakguy2025-07-21 18:11
    Proposal: front/back COG images for scanned maps
  • Issue comment#66kgjenkins2025-07-21 18:02
    Proposal: front/back COG images for scanned maps
  • Issue#66kgjenkins2025-07-21 17:19
    Handle front/back COG images for scanned maps
  • Issue#65karenmajewicz2025-07-14 22:27
    Determine structure of Collection level records
  • Issue comment#63karenmajewicz2025-04-10 23:28
    New proposal: add a plain text field analogous to isPartOf in GBL 1.0
  • Issue#55karenmajewicz2024-08-16 13:30
    Clarify which special characters are allowed in the ID field
  • Issue comment#55kgjenkins2024-08-13 21:35
    Clarify which special characters are allowed in the ID field
  • Issue comment#55kgjenkins2024-08-09 23:37
    Clarify which special characters are allowed in the ID field
  • Issue comment#60kgjenkins2024-08-08 21:23
    Add "Display Note" to crosswalk tables
  • Issue#60kgjenkins2024-08-08 21:23
    Add "Display Note" to crosswalk tables

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 0 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.