Skip to content

Program-Analysis-Team-18/assert-aware-analyzer

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

A dynamic analysis framework to identify problematic (side-effect, redundant, useless) assertions in safety-critical Java code, inspired by NASA's "Power of 10" rules.

active 2025-11-032025-12-10 (UTC)

Partial coverage17,640 / 22,658 hourly files (78%) · 2 absent upstream · 5,017 failed, retryable2024-01-112026-08-12 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
114
Pushes
47
Pull requests
5
Issues
23
Stars
0
Forks
0

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 38 days from 2025-11-03 to 2025-12-10. Pushes: 47 total, peak 7 in a day. Pull requests: 5 total, peak 2 in a day. Issues: 23 total, peak 9 in a day. Comments: 12 total, peak 3 in a day. Stars: 0 total, peak 0 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
bareshub437210
KsaweryL251930
TistaMilani161102
petteriraita6500
Beatricia6000
WallachianMihai5500

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue#22bareshub2025-12-09 12:22
    Project Overview (deadline 8 Dec)
  • Pull request#31KsaweryL2025-11-28 00:02
  • Issue#28bareshub2025-11-27 10:35
    Create Execution Time Tracking Metrics
  • Pull request#26KsaweryL2025-11-25 19:56
  • Issue comment#18bareshub2025-11-24 19:34
    Write Paper Structure
  • Issue#24Beatricia2025-11-24 13:45
    Paper: Compare with 2 existing tools
  • Issue#24Beatricia2025-11-24 13:45
    Paper: Compare with 2 existing tools
  • Issue#22Beatricia2025-11-24 11:51
    Project Overview (deadline 8 Dec)
  • Issue#19Beatricia2025-11-23 08:57
    Write Email to Ask for More Points
  • Issue#18bareshub2025-11-17 20:10
    Write Paper Structure
  • Issue#16bareshub2025-11-17 20:04
    Create a Clean Benchmark Suite
  • Issue#16bareshub2025-11-17 20:04
    Create a Clean Benchmark Suite
  • Issue#16bareshub2025-11-17 20:04
    Create a Clean Benchmark Suite
  • Issue#15bareshub2025-11-17 20:02
    Analysis-Informed Code Rewriting
  • Issue#14bareshub2025-11-17 20:01
    Symbolic Execution (KISS)
  • Issue#4Beatricia2025-11-17 11:52
    Coverage-based Fuzzing
  • Issue comment#12TistaMilani2025-11-17 01:34
    Define a common structure for the framework objects
  • Issue#11TistaMilani2025-11-17 01:27
    Add documentation for the Syntactic Analysis
  • Issue#10TistaMilani2025-11-17 01:26
    Syntactic Analysis doesn't work for methods not listed in the JPAMB suite
  • Pull request#9KsaweryL2025-11-16 22:41
  • Issue#7petteriraita2025-11-10 15:53
    parse formal parameters
  • Issue#4Beatricia2025-11-05 14:49
    Coverage-based Fuzzing
  • Issue#5bareshub2025-11-05 14:13
    Improve the Interpreter
  • Issue#5bareshub2025-11-05 14:13
    Improve the Interpreter
  • Issue#2bareshub2025-11-05 11:35
    Syntactic Analysis

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 0 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.