Skip to content

SuffolkLITLab/docassemble-MATCSmallClaims

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

Small claims

active 2024-06-052026-07-16 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,394 / 26,394 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-18 (UTC)
Events
629
Pushes
139
Pull requests
36
Issues
225
Stars
0
Forks
0

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 772 days from 2024-06-05 to 2026-07-16. Pushes: 139 total, peak 13 in a day. Pull requests: 36 total, peak 4 in a day. Issues: 225 total, peak 42 in a day. Comments: 139 total, peak 23 in a day. Stars: 0 total, peak 0 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
samglover204391177
MarkMarotta010039106
nicoledimitri9620424
nava-ebad772452
nonprofittechy421023
aryy-suffolk331267
BryceStevenWilley4400

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue#160MarkMarotta02026-01-20 19:57
    Fix number of attorney string
  • Issue comment#138nicoledimitri2025-05-04 03:07
    Research whether the user can get military information about a defendant instantaneously, or if there is a processing delay that would require the filer to save and exit the interview
  • Issue comment#122nicoledimitri2025-05-04 03:06
    Which courts should users be able to file in?
  • Issue#122nicoledimitri2025-05-04 03:06
    Which courts should users be able to file in?
  • Issue#156nicoledimitri2025-05-04 03:04
    Revise “Signing Under Oath” default screen to clarify what is being certified
  • Issue#155nicoledimitri2025-05-04 02:57
    Fix Review screen logic to ensure that user need not re-approve all answers after first edited input
  • Issue#154nicoledimitri2025-05-04 02:52
    Improve drop-down template on court selection screen
  • Issue#153nicoledimitri2025-05-04 02:45
    Revise Military Affidavit question screen to match Yes/No format of PDF's military service questions
  • Issue#152nicoledimitri2025-05-04 02:40
    Add optional email fields for all party types collected
  • Issue#151nicoledimitri2025-05-04 02:36
    Confirm that business defendant's address always collected
  • Issue#150nicoledimitri2025-05-04 02:32
    Clarify how address input affects court selection
  • Issue#149nicoledimitri2025-05-04 02:29
    Ensure defendant’s address is a required field and listed in the "Review" screen items
  • Issue comment#142nicoledimitri2025-03-06 21:49
    Troubleshoot address field validation
  • Issue#142nicoledimitri2025-03-06 18:54
    Troubleshoot address field validation
  • Pull request#147nicoledimitri2025-02-20 17:55
  • Pull request#147nicoledimitri2025-02-20 17:55
  • Pull request#146nicoledimitri2025-02-20 17:53
  • Pull request#145nicoledimitri2025-02-20 17:50
  • Issue comment#129nicoledimitri2025-02-20 04:54
    Add navigation sections for Welcome and Required information(?)
  • Issue#129nicoledimitri2025-02-20 04:54
    Add navigation sections for Welcome and Required information(?)
  • Issue#127nicoledimitri2025-02-20 04:24
    Add a wet-ink-signature option
  • Issue comment#133nicoledimitri2025-02-16 05:15
    Make the zip code required in address questions
  • Issue#134nicoledimitri2025-02-16 05:02
    Plaintiff's additional contact information fields should be optional
  • Issue comment#137nicoledimitri2025-02-16 05:01
    Defendants' additional contact information fields should be optional
  • Issue#137nicoledimitri2025-02-16 05:01
    Defendants' additional contact information fields should be optional

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 0 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.