Turn feature requests into review-ready pull requests: issue, implementation, tests, a review-and-fix loop, and docs. Runs locally or on GitHub Actions, and is built for complex brownfield repos. Each week its retrospective reads what you actually merged and proposes improvements to your skill extensions.
active 2026-07-30 → 2026-08-20 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 22 days from 2026-07-30 to 2026-08-20. Pushes: 523 total, peak 54 in a day. Pull requests: 6 total, peak 1 in a day. Issues: 3 total, peak 1 in a day. Comments: 13 total, peak 3 in a day. Stars: 0 total, peak 0 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| prflow-implementer[bot] | 236 | 229 | 5 | 2 |
| The01Geek | 219 | 212 | 1 | 3 |
| github-actions[bot] | 86 | 82 | 0 | 4 |
| prflow-reviewer[bot] | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| mintlify[bot] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue#1821The01Geek2026-08-20 17:07No view of implement-run outcomes over time: the clean-vs-imperfect series already exists but nothing renders it
- Issue comment#1778mintlify[bot]2026-08-19 16:30Add an AWS Bedrock route to the cloud tier provider map
- Issue comment#1762github-actions[bot]2026-08-19 00:20Close the two Windows-only failures in the Python helper floor
- Pull request#1758The01Geek2026-08-18 23:37
- Issue comment#1752github-actions[bot]2026-08-18 22:19Load the Step 3.6 procedure set only when an audit round is elected
- Pull request#1737prflow-implementer[bot]2026-08-17 22:10
- Issue comment#1661prflow-reviewer[bot]2026-08-13 01:29Rewrite the create-issue issue template so it models the prose it asks drafters to write
- Issue comment#1632prflow-reviewer[bot]2026-08-12 05:56fix: ampersand-free §1.5 tick operand + tier-refusal arm + metacharacter guard (#1630)
- Pull request#1578prflow-implementer[bot]2026-08-11 01:12
- Pull request#1571prflow-implementer[bot]2026-08-10 23:15
- Issue comment#1425The01Geek2026-08-08 03:09chore(skills): editorially compress the review engine's five Phase 0-2 references under the instruction-plus-consequence prose rule
- Pull request#1427prflow-implementer[bot]2026-08-08 02:48
- Issue comment#1420The01Geek2026-08-08 01:28chore(skills): editorially compress the fix loop's fixing.md, error-handling.md and convergence.md under the instruction-plus-consequence prose rule
- Pull request#1412prflow-implementer[bot]2026-08-07 22:55
- Issue comment#1407prflow-implementer[bot]2026-08-07 22:50docs: refresh PRFlow public site design and content
- Issue comment#1401github-actions[bot]2026-08-07 20:14A vendored skill points at PRFlow's own CLAUDE.md, which never reaches a consumer, and no lint sees it
- Issue comment#1400The01Geek2026-08-07 20:06chore(skills): bring phase-1-setup.md under the instruction-plus-consequence prose rule
- Issue#1400The01Geek2026-08-07 20:03chore(skills): bring phase-1-setup.md under the instruction-plus-consequence prose rule
- Issue comment#1296prflow-reviewer[bot]2026-08-04 22:14Register apply-issue-dependencies.py and resolve-existing-pr.sh in required_helper_heads.implement (#1034)
- Issue#1212The01Geek2026-08-04 00:39The implement/review-and-fix verdict headline is an unversioned prose contract read across a plugin-version boundary; misreading it ships a run unreviewed
- Issue comment#1225prflow-implementer[bot]2026-08-03 22:58fix: disable git path quoting in the shared lib/test population reader
- Issue comment#1020github-actions[bot]2026-07-31 22:18Step 3.5 mechanism-dependency sweep: determine whether a depended-on capability exists before selecting a discharge route
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 0 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.