active 2023-11-24 → 2026-02-27 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 827 days from 2023-11-24 to 2026-02-27. Pushes: 1 total, peak 1 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 5 total, peak 5 in a day. Comments: 1 total, peak 1 in a day. Stars: 0 total, peak 0 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XiaoTianCan | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue#4XiaoTianCan2024-02-24 04:14[IETF 118] Keyur Patel: As WG chair, most of this work belongs to SAVNET WG. As WG member, you may need to consider more complex cases, such as when fast convergence is enabled.
- Issue#3XiaoTianCan2024-02-24 04:13[IETF 118] Antoin Verschuren: How to validate the prefixes which are not routed? It needs more clarification.
- Issue#2XiaoTianCan2024-02-24 04:12[IETF 118] David Lamparter: Disagree with the security considerations in the draft, need to have more text there for eBGP. The presented mechanism on slide 6 is not clear to me.
- Issue comment#1XiaoTianCan2024-02-24 04:10[IETF 118] David Lamparter: Disagree with the security considerations in the draft, need to have more text there for eBGP. The presented mechanism on slide 6 is not clear to me.
- Issue#1XiaoTianCan2024-02-24 04:10[IETF 118] David Lamparter: Disagree with the security considerations in the draft, need to have more text there for eBGP. The presented mechanism on slide 6 is not clear to me.
- Issue#1XiaoTianCan2024-02-24 03:59[IETF 118] David Lamparter: Disagree with the security considerations in the draft, need to have more text there for eBGP. The presented mechanism on slide 6 is not clear to me.
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 0 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.