Custom Diffusion: Multi-Concept Customization of Text-to-Image Diffusion (CVPR 2023)
active 2023-08-24 → 2026-05-24 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 1005 days from 2023-08-24 to 2026-05-24. Pushes: 5 total, peak 1 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 22 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 46 total, peak 6 in a day. Stars: 314 total, peak 5 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nupurkmr9 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 17 |
| taehyeonEum | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| OchiaiNao | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| daeunni | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| ZZZBBBZZZ | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| liushao | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shentao-YANG | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| A-raniy-day | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| zhangyun-w | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| arushijain71 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| yoon28 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| qiguming | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| wsfk716 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| zaczywy | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| isamu-isozaki | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| jy-choi-git | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1220926326 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| aishwarymishra09 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| VernalXu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| aniket004 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue comment#98chenyangzhu12024-10-11 07:56retrieve.py question
- Issue comment#96nupurkmr92024-08-04 17:25Is this version trained with lora?
- Issue comment#89aniket0042024-07-22 22:30Is it possible to train multi joint training with SDXL? diffusers_training_sdxl.py seems impossible for multi joint training.
- Issue comment#98chenjingcheng2024-06-29 14:16retrieve.py question
- Issue comment#35yoon282024-06-12 02:33retrieve.py doesn't work
- Issue comment#35kuailexiaohunzi2024-06-12 02:24retrieve.py doesn't work
- Issue comment#35yoon282024-06-12 00:57retrieve.py doesn't work
- Issue comment#92VernalXu2024-04-15 05:50Does the diffusers version now work properly?
- Issue comment#91Shentao-YANG2024-04-01 00:44Missing text prompts?
- Issue#91Shentao-YANG2024-04-01 00:44Missing text prompts?
- Issue comment#95nupurkmr92024-03-31 21:37Unable to retrieve the image used for regularization.
- Issue comment#93nupurkmr92024-03-31 21:35why the results produced by the model training and verification are inconsistent with the results I test using the saved model weights?
- Issue comment#91nupurkmr92024-03-31 21:34Missing text prompts?
- Issue comment#90nupurkmr92024-03-31 21:28Question about loss on valid image region during training
- Issue comment#89nupurkmr92024-03-31 21:26Is it possible to train multi joint training with SDXL? diffusers_training_sdxl.py seems impossible for multi joint training.
- Issue comment#92aishwarymishra092024-03-31 21:02Does the diffusers version now work properly?
- Issue#93baimazhaoge2024-03-25 01:01why the results produced by the model training and verification are inconsistent with the results I test using the saved model weights?
- Issue comment#73nrsz000112024-03-24 11:47Plan for integration of SDXL? It seems to require more work than changing the MODEL_NAME
- Issue comment#32digbangbang2024-03-07 06:24time out when connect to laion.ai
- Issue#92wsfk7162024-03-02 12:05Does the diffusers version now work properly?
- Issue#91Shentao-YANG2024-02-21 06:08Missing text prompts?
- Issue#70aatiibutt2024-02-02 22:49How to Visualize Attention Maps to Analyze Compositions?
- Issue comment#88nupurkmr92024-02-01 01:57why my optimization based weights merging is not work?
- Issue comment#88ZZZBBBZZZ2024-01-30 07:30why my optimization based weights merging is not work?
- Issue comment#88zaczywy2024-01-30 07:28why my optimization based weights merging is not work?
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 314 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.