Skip to content

bubbliiiing/classification-pytorch

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

这是各个主干网络分类模型的源码,可以用于训练自己的分类模型。

active 2023-08-152026-03-29 (UTC)

Partial coverage20,519 / 26,275 hourly files (78%) · 2 absent upstream · 5,753 failed, retryable2023-08-152026-08-13 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
141
Pushes
0
Pull requests
0
Issues
7
Stars
109
Forks
15

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 958 days from 2023-08-15 to 2026-03-29. Pushes: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 7 total, peak 1 in a day. Comments: 10 total, peak 6 in a day. Stars: 109 total, peak 2 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
zhujilin19954004
seudwh1233003
Bug-CUDA2001
renyu-renyu2001
hao-ux1001
ScottXiao2331000
2458zhanghehe1000
liu4911970061000
xuwenlong03151000
heeeeyuhang1000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue#362458zhanghehe2024-10-26 15:16
    release_v1.0里面少了swinTransformer的base权重
  • Issue#35liu4911970062024-07-04 07:44
    从0开始训练的效果差
  • Issue#34heeeeyuhang2024-06-28 11:08
    使用vit进行预测的问题
  • Issue#33Bug-CUDA2024-06-21 02:28
    报错RuntimeError: CUDA error: CUBLAS_STATUS_EXECUTION_FAILED when calling cublasSgemm
  • Issue comment#3Bug-CUDA2024-06-21 02:20
    迭代到50之后就停止了
  • Issue comment#27zhujilin19952024-03-18 03:55
    为什么验证精度比训练精度高?
  • Issue comment#27seudwh1232024-03-18 03:47
    为什么验证精度比训练精度高?
  • Issue comment#27zhujilin19952024-03-18 03:42
    为什么验证精度比训练精度高?
  • Issue comment#27seudwh1232024-03-18 03:28
    为什么验证精度比训练精度高?
  • Issue comment#27zhujilin19952024-03-18 03:22
    为什么验证精度比训练精度高?
  • Issue comment#27zhujilin19952024-03-18 02:55
    为什么验证精度比训练精度高?
  • Issue comment#27seudwh1232024-03-07 01:23
    为什么验证精度比训练精度高?
  • Issue comment#30hao-ux2024-02-08 05:49
    为什么dataloader中没有标签的onehot编码?
  • Issue#30xuwenlong03152023-12-21 02:23
    为什么dataloader中没有标签的onehot编码?
  • Issue#28ScottXiao2332023-11-25 03:19
    Google Drive预训练权重
  • Issue#27renyu-renyu2023-11-18 01:51
    为什么验证精度比训练精度高?
  • Issue comment#19renyu-renyu2023-11-14 06:19
    您好,请问dataloader中对验证集数据先resize再center_crop的目的是什么呢?

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 109 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.