Support for DataNucleus persistence using the JDO API (JSR0012, JSR0243)
active 2023-10-16 → 2026-06-17 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 976 days from 2023-10-16 to 2026-06-17. Pushes: 25 total, peak 4 in a day. Pull requests: 6 total, peak 2 in a day. Issues: 14 total, peak 3 in a day. Comments: 12 total, peak 2 in a day. Stars: 3 total, peak 1 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| andyjefferson | 42 | 25 | 2 | 8 |
| mboapache | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| galinafrank | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| dependabot[bot] | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| javasmithy | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| jgolinowski | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| kraendavid | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Pull request#140dependabot[bot]2025-12-19 22:54
- Pull request#140dependabot[bot]2025-12-19 22:54
- Issue#139javasmithy2025-07-14 11:28Not possible to define fetch group as specified by JDO spec 3.2.pdf
- Issue comment#138galinafrank2025-04-18 15:16Bug LowerCase acces to datanucleus.allowListenerUpdateAfterInit dont work
- Issue#138galinafrank2025-04-18 10:11Bug LowerCase acces to datanucleus.allowListenerUpdateAfterInit dont work
- Issue#131andyjefferson2024-11-23 13:40JDO TCK 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT failing
- Issue comment#136andyjefferson2024-10-14 12:00Test case to reproduce an issue with executing a JDOQLType query with a result clause of candidate() or candidate(„this“)
- Issue#136andyjefferson2024-10-14 12:00Test case to reproduce an issue with executing a JDOQLType query with a result clause of candidate() or candidate(„this“)
- Pull request#135andyjefferson2024-10-14 11:49
- Issue#137andyjefferson2024-10-14 11:48Fix to JDOQL typed query with result clause of candidate
- Issue#137andyjefferson2024-10-14 11:47Fix to JDOQL typed query with result clause of candidate
- Issue#136mboapache2024-10-13 18:56Test case to reproduce an issue with executing a JDOQLType query with a result clause of candidate() or candidate(„this“)
- Pull request#135mboapache2024-10-13 18:54
- Issue comment#133andyjefferson2024-10-08 04:45JDOQLTypedQuery: wrong query result when replacing QFullTimeEmployee.candidate() by QFullTimeEmployee.candidate("this")
- Issue comment#133mboapache2024-10-07 20:04JDOQLTypedQuery: wrong query result when replacing QFullTimeEmployee.candidate() by QFullTimeEmployee.candidate("this")
- Issue#134andyjefferson2024-10-07 07:31Apply #133 to master (6.0) branch
- Issue#134andyjefferson2024-10-07 07:30Apply #133 to master (6.0) branch
- Issue comment#133andyjefferson2024-10-07 07:29JDOQLTypedQuery: wrong query result when replacing QFullTimeEmployee.candidate() by QFullTimeEmployee.candidate("this")
- Issue comment#133mboapache2024-10-04 15:33JDOQLTypedQuery: wrong query result when replacing QFullTimeEmployee.candidate() by QFullTimeEmployee.candidate("this")
- Issue comment#133andyjefferson2024-09-26 14:36JDOQLTypedQuery: wrong query result when replacing QFullTimeEmployee.candidate() by QFullTimeEmployee.candidate("this")
- Issue comment#133andyjefferson2024-09-22 16:58JDOQLTypedQuery: wrong query result when replacing QFullTimeEmployee.candidate() by QFullTimeEmployee.candidate("this")
- Issue comment#133mboapache2024-09-15 08:39JDOQLTypedQuery: wrong query result when replacing QFullTimeEmployee.candidate() by QFullTimeEmployee.candidate("this")
- Issue#133mboapache2024-09-08 17:10JDOQLTypedQuery: wrong query result when replacing QFullTimeEmployee.candidate() by QFullTimeEmployee.candidate("this")
- Issue comment#132andyjefferson2024-08-18 10:03Missing extensions in IndexMetaData when multiple indices are defined at class-level via @Index annotation
- Issue#132andyjefferson2024-08-18 10:03Missing extensions in IndexMetaData when multiple indices are defined at class-level via @Index annotation
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 3 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.