Skip to content

destiny-evidence/data-extraction-evaluation-toolkit

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

A suite of tools, data models, etc. for extracting data from documents (e.g. papers) and evaluating the performance of such extraction tasks.

active 2026-04-072026-08-05 (UTC)

Partial coverage10,777 / 11,009 hourly files (98%) · 2 absent upstream · 229 failed, retryable2025-05-082026-08-10 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
229
Pushes
112
Pull requests
4
Issues
10
Stars
1
Forks
0

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 121 days from 2026-04-07 to 2026-08-05. Pushes: 112 total, peak 9 in a day. Pull requests: 4 total, peak 1 in a day. Issues: 10 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 43 total, peak 14 in a day. Stars: 1 total, peak 1 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
mcallaghan946638
nikloynes268116
github-actions[bot]181008
kaitlynhair10305
IshitaGopal9702
L-ENA7502
harryjmoss6600
VJonah4101
sagaruprety4400
AilbheF1100
Copilot1001
renovate[bot]1100

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Pull request#314mcallaghan2026-07-29 14:54
  • Issue#323mcallaghan2026-07-02 12:38
    Non-meaningful columns in csv-files raise an error
  • Issue#323mcallaghan2026-07-02 12:38
    Non-meaningful columns in csv-files raise an error
  • Issue comment#275github-actions[bot]2026-06-04 10:51
    Revise DEET sys prompt
  • Issue comment#99kaitlynhair2026-06-01 10:54
    Response format passed to LLM does not ensure desired response
  • Issue comment#272github-actions[bot]2026-05-29 08:23
    Merge main into dev
  • Issue comment#244github-actions[bot]2026-05-23 10:21
    Feature/241 extraction without linking or evaluating
  • Issue#273mcallaghan2026-05-21 11:05
    Providing unsupported parameters to a model causes an error
  • Issue comment#207kaitlynhair2026-05-18 10:32
    Determine process for versioning updates once v1 release public
  • Pull request#251nikloynes2026-04-30 15:57
  • Issue#134mcallaghan2026-04-27 07:54
    Create generic DEET converter
  • Issue comment#153mcallaghan2026-04-25 16:43
    method for coercing `output_data` to correct `AttributeType` in `GoldStandardAnnotation`
  • Pull request#243mcallaghan2026-04-24 08:54
  • Issue#241mcallaghan2026-04-23 18:36
    Extract data without gold standard annotation data
  • Issue comment#207kaitlynhair2026-04-23 13:46
    Determine process for versioning updates once v1 release public
  • Pull request#235mcallaghan2026-04-23 07:04
  • Issue#238mcallaghan2026-04-22 12:46
    Add instructions to install the right version of python with uv to docs
  • Issue comment#235github-actions[bot]2026-04-22 07:43
    restore eppiconverter logic from PR#117, make sure boolean annotations are set to True if they exist in EppiJson
  • Issue comment#235github-actions[bot]2026-04-21 09:37
    restore eppiconverter logic from PR#117, make sure boolean annotations are set to True if they exist in EppiJson
  • Issue comment#198kaitlynhair2026-04-20 10:29
    Retaining external identifiers when coercing into DEET-supported identifiers
  • Issue comment#86kaitlynhair2026-04-20 08:47
    create MVP CSV-EPPI converter
  • Issue#86kaitlynhair2026-04-20 08:47
    create MVP CSV-EPPI converter
  • Issue comment#229github-actions[bot]2026-04-15 00:33
    Feature/evaluator fails gracefully
  • Issue comment#229github-actions[bot]2026-04-15 00:17
    Feature/evaluator fails gracefully
  • Issue#228mcallaghan2026-04-14 19:37
    Fail more gracefully when trying to evaluate

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 1 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.