Skip to content

active 2024-07-192026-01-16 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,497 / 26,497 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-23 (UTC)
Events
66
Pushes
36
Pull requests
0
Issues
6
Stars
10
Forks
0

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 547 days from 2024-07-19 to 2026-01-16. Pushes: 36 total, peak 9 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 6 total, peak 1 in a day. Comments: 13 total, peak 5 in a day. Stars: 10 total, peak 1 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
ezekg4736010
Dieterbe4002
kaspermarstal3001
roryokane1000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#4ezekg2025-01-31 22:07
    Clarification needed: Copyright ownership and non-compete implications of contributions (PRs) under FCL-1.0
  • Issue#4kaspermarstal2025-01-31 11:45
    Clarification needed: Copyright ownership and non-compete implications of contributions (PRs) under FCL-1.0
  • Issue comment#4kaspermarstal2025-01-31 11:45
    Clarification needed: Copyright ownership and non-compete implications of contributions (PRs) under FCL-1.0
  • Issue comment#4ezekg2025-01-24 21:05
    Clarification needed: Copyright ownership and non-compete implications of contributions (PRs) under FCL-1.0
  • Issue#4kaspermarstal2025-01-24 20:51
    Clarification needed: Copyright ownership and non-compete implications of contributions (PRs) under FCL-1.0
  • Issue comment#3ezekg2024-09-03 12:57
    "Fair Core is to Fair Source what Open Core is to Open Source." doesn't make sense to me
  • Issue comment#3ezekg2024-09-03 12:55
    "Fair Core is to Fair Source what Open Core is to Open Source." doesn't make sense to me
  • Issue comment#3Dieterbe2024-09-03 12:42
    "Fair Core is to Fair Source what Open Core is to Open Source." doesn't make sense to me
  • Issue comment#3ezekg2024-09-03 12:31
    "Fair Core is to Fair Source what Open Core is to Open Source." doesn't make sense to me
  • Issue comment#3ezekg2024-09-03 12:24
    "Fair Core is to Fair Source what Open Core is to Open Source." doesn't make sense to me
  • Issue#3Dieterbe2024-09-03 11:53
    "Fair Core is to Fair Source what Open Core is to Open Source." doesn't make sense to me
  • Issue comment#2Dieterbe2024-08-19 08:58
    "direct competition"
  • Issue comment#2ezekg2024-08-16 15:30
    "direct competition"
  • Issue#2Dieterbe2024-08-16 15:24
    "direct competition"
  • Issue comment#1ezekg2024-07-22 19:24
    Confusing parts of the license text (suggestions from a non-lawyer)
  • Issue#1ezekg2024-07-22 19:24
    Confusing parts of the license text (suggestions from a non-lawyer)
  • Issue comment#1ezekg2024-07-22 14:49
    Confusing parts of the license text (suggestions from a non-lawyer)
  • Issue comment#1ezekg2024-07-21 21:16
    Confusing parts of the license text (suggestions from a non-lawyer)
  • Issue#1roryokane2024-07-20 01:35
    Confusing parts of the license text (suggestions from a non-lawyer)

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 10 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.