Skip to content

A modular, fast, and accurate simulation framework for (column) liquid chromatography

active 2023-08-162024-07-26 (UTC)

Partial coverage20,466 / 26,223 hourly files (78%) · 2 absent upstream · 5,753 failed, retryable2023-08-162026-08-13 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
183
Pushes
46
Pull requests
21
Issues
17
Stars
7
Forks
2

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 346 days from 2023-08-16 to 2024-07-26. Pushes: 46 total, peak 5 in a day. Pull requests: 21 total, peak 3 in a day. Issues: 17 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 56 total, peak 5 in a day. Stars: 7 total, peak 1 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
jbreue164314613
schmoelder386415
WFlynnZ231306
ronald-jaepel21954
sleweke9333
sleweke-bayer9034
AntoniaBerger5104
avasyanin3002
hannahlanzrath3003
angelamoser12001
Kats12471001

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue#253jbreue162024-07-26 07:33
    Translate documentation to markdown
  • Issue comment#112WFlynnZ2024-07-25 23:24
    Crystallization reaction module
  • Issue comment#112WFlynnZ2024-07-25 23:24
    Crystallization reaction module
  • Issue comment#252AntoniaBerger2024-07-25 19:37
    Transportmodul for MCT
  • Issue comment#232angelamoser12024-07-10 20:45
    Add linear ionic strength dependence for colloidal isotherm
  • Issue comment#233schmoelder2024-07-07 11:23
    2D GRM needs at least one particle type
  • Issue comment#233jbreue162024-07-06 15:43
    2D GRM needs at least one particle type
  • Issue#233jbreue162024-07-06 15:22
    2D GRM needs at least one particle type
  • Issue#232angelamoser12024-07-04 16:56
    Add linear ionic strength dependence for colloidal isotherm
  • Issue comment#230jbreue162024-06-29 15:27
    Update MCT Documentation
  • Issue comment#221jbreue162024-06-29 13:44
    Choose best defaults for modified Newton method
  • Issue comment#228jbreue162024-06-27 11:45
    MCT does not reproduce LRM with linear binding via exchange
  • Issue comment#229AntoniaBerger2024-06-27 11:29
    Add MCT exchange v.s LRM with linear binding test
  • Issue comment#229AntoniaBerger2024-06-27 11:29
    Add MCT exchange v.s LRM with linear binding test
  • Issue comment#229AntoniaBerger2024-06-27 11:26
    Add MCT exchange v.s LRM with linear binding test
  • Issue comment#228jbreue162024-06-26 20:53
    MCT does not reproduce LRM with linear binding via exchange
  • Issue#228jbreue162024-06-26 20:52
    MCT does not reproduce LRM with linear binding via exchange
  • Issue#201jbreue162024-06-25 00:04
    Test fwd vs bwd flow Jacobian doesnt work for modified Newton branch
  • Issue#216jbreue162024-06-23 13:10
    Choose best default for linear solver in DG units
  • Issue#221jbreue162024-06-21 11:56
    Choose best defaults for modified Newton method
  • Issue comment#220sleweke-bayer2024-06-21 11:44
    Automatically compute binding model Jacobians via AD
  • Pull request#220sleweke-bayer2024-06-21 11:32
  • Pull request#219sleweke-bayer2024-06-21 06:25
  • Pull request#212jbreue162024-06-14 19:41
  • Issue comment#211schmoelder2024-06-14 07:05
    Make the CSTR porosity and liquid volume definition consistent with the notation of the other unit operations.

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 7 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.