The official implementation of the ICML 2023 paper OFQ-ViT
active 2023-08-16 → 2025-11-04 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 812 days from 2023-08-16 to 2025-11-04. Pushes: 4 total, peak 3 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 9 total, peak 4 in a day. Comments: 7 total, peak 1 in a day. Stars: 22 total, peak 2 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| nbasyl | 13 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| temporydan | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| jiho264 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| brisker | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| dashangyanhua | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| techmonsterwang | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| LuletterSoul | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue comment#4jiho2642025-06-26 06:57The +0.5 term in StatQ results in asymmetric weight quantization.
- Issue comment#4dashangyanhua2025-04-16 16:08The +0.5 term in StatQ results in asymmetric weight quantization.
- Issue#3nbasyl2024-04-20 12:37Toy example
- Issue#2nbasyl2024-04-20 12:37Is there any analysis on the oscillation problem on the activation quantization?
- Issue#1nbasyl2024-04-20 12:37Does mixed precision training greatly affect performance?
- Issue#5nbasyl2024-04-20 12:36The activation was never quantized in the code OR WaS iT?
- Issue comment#5temporydan2024-02-24 03:59The activation was never quantized in the code OR WaS iT?
- Issue comment#5nbasyl2024-02-23 17:29The activation was never quantized in the code
- Issue#5temporydan2024-02-16 19:45The activation was never quantized in the code
- Issue#4LuletterSoul2024-01-30 06:41The +0.5 term in StatQ results in asymmetric weight quantization.
- Issue comment#3nbasyl2023-11-23 10:24Toy example
- Issue#3techmonsterwang2023-11-19 04:42Toy example
- Issue comment#1nbasyl2023-09-02 06:50Does mixed precision training greatly affect performance?
- Issue#1nbasyl2023-09-02 06:50Does mixed precision training greatly affect performance?
- Issue comment#2nbasyl2023-08-29 08:14Is there any analysis on the oscillation problem on the activation quantization?
- Issue#2brisker2023-08-21 02:45Is there any analysis on the oscillation problem on the activation quantization?
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 22 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.