Ultra-fast SQL-like queries on Java collections
active 2023-08-18 → 2026-02-02 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 900 days from 2023-08-18 to 2026-02-02. Pushes: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Pull requests: 1 total, peak 1 in a day. Issues: 7 total, peak 1 in a day. Comments: 15 total, peak 3 in a day. Stars: 162 total, peak 4 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lvitaly | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| emrul | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MSaifAsif | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| ronyjhn | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| brinvex-dev1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| demwis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| pluong | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| fulanya | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| ouaibsky | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| lucastheisen | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| muhdkhokhar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| jeansossmeier | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Nikhilkarande33 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Harshitha-HN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Karthik-Rangasamy | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue comment#321MSaifAsif2025-12-22 16:31Issues with Offheap Concurrent Index collection clear()
- Issue comment#326MSaifAsif2025-12-22 16:30InvalidQueryException: Failed to parse as type Long, Does the value need to match the Target type?
- Issue#327pluong2025-09-16 22:38Vulnerability in old sqlite-jdbc version
- Issue#326Karthik-Rangasamy2025-06-26 03:34In query, Does the value need to match the Target type?
- Issue comment#323brinvex-dev12025-01-30 14:42Is CQEngine officially dead?
- Issue comment#323brinvex-dev12025-01-30 14:42Is CQEngine officially dead?
- Issue comment#323MSaifAsif2025-01-24 20:05Is CQEngine officially dead?
- Issue comment#307lucastheisen2024-12-27 21:42Support for ANTLR 4.10.1
- Issue comment#323fulanya2024-10-30 08:49Is CQEngine officially dead?
- Issue comment#316jeansossmeier2024-10-27 14:44Added ChronicleMap persistence as an alternative to SQLite
- Issue comment#323ouaibsky2024-08-06 18:59Is CQEngine officially dead?
- Issue comment#322ronyjhn2024-07-25 09:48Getting below error on jdk17.0.8.8.1
- Issue#325Harshitha-HN2024-02-07 14:38com/googlecode/concurrenttrees/radix/node/NodeFactory
- Issue comment#323emrul2024-01-02 12:46Is CQEngine officially dead?
- Issue comment#323emrul2023-12-29 23:38Is CQEngine officially dead?
- Issue comment#323lvitaly2023-12-29 16:37Is CQEngine officially dead?
- Issue comment#323emrul2023-12-29 16:05Is CQEngine officially dead?
- Issue comment#324lvitaly2023-12-28 15:31Attempt to support JDK 17
- Pull request#324lvitaly2023-12-27 20:30
- Issue#323demwis2023-12-18 20:08Is CQEngine officially dead?
- Issue#318ronyjhn2023-12-11 05:57Index updated even though objectStore is not modified during IndexedCollection add
- Issue#322Nikhilkarande332023-11-06 17:10Getting below error on jdk17.0.8.8.1
- Issue#321muhdkhokhar2023-09-25 11:06Issues with Offheap Concurrent Index collection clear()
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 162 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.