Skip to content

pymc-devs/pymc_workflow_analyzer

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

active 2023-10-072023-12-06 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,624 / 26,624 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-28 (UTC)
Events
51
Pushes
3
Pull requests
3
Issues
9
Stars
4
Forks
1

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 61 days from 2023-10-07 to 2023-12-06. Pushes: 3 total, peak 2 in a day. Pull requests: 3 total, peak 2 in a day. Issues: 9 total, peak 5 in a day. Comments: 19 total, peak 8 in a day. Stars: 4 total, peak 1 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
canyon28922326
purna13515019
OriolAbril6004

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Pull request#9canyon2892023-11-11 15:14
  • Issue comment#7canyon2892023-11-11 15:11
    Implement initial static analyzer
  • Issue#6canyon2892023-11-11 15:11
    Static Analysis of PyMC
  • Pull request#7canyon2892023-11-11 15:11
  • Issue#8canyon2892023-11-11 15:10
    Is there a better approach to listing all the samplers that PyMC supports?
  • Issue comment#7canyon2892023-10-24 00:45
    Implement initial static analyzer
  • Issue comment#7purna1352023-10-23 21:46
    Implement initial static analyzer
  • Issue comment#7purna1352023-10-21 13:43
    Implement initial static analyzer
  • Issue comment#7OriolAbril2023-10-21 13:00
    Implement initial static analyzer
  • Issue comment#7canyon2892023-10-21 00:08
    Implement initial static analyzer
  • Issue comment#7purna1352023-10-20 20:32
    Implement initial static analyzer
  • Pull request#7purna1352023-10-17 20:12
  • Issue comment#3OriolAbril2023-10-14 15:01
    [Discussion] Static or Dynamic analysis, .py (with no output) vs ipynb (that includes output) analysis
  • Issue#6canyon2892023-10-14 14:49
    Static Analysis of PyMC
  • Issue#5canyon2892023-10-14 14:48
    Inference Data Anayzler
  • Issue#4canyon2892023-10-07 15:32
    [
  • Issue comment#3canyon2892023-10-07 15:24
    [Discussion] Static or Dynamic analysis
  • Issue#4canyon2892023-10-07 15:23
    [
  • Issue#3canyon2892023-10-07 14:58
    [Discussion] Static or Dynamic analysis
  • Issue#2canyon2892023-10-07 14:41
    Return true that this model uses pm.sample
  • Issue#1canyon2892023-10-07 14:39
    Come up with a logo or fun image for this repo

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 4 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.