Skip to content

I'm starting to use GitHub for work on my blog. Why not? It's got good communication and collaboration tools. Why not hook it up to a blog?

active 2023-08-15 → 2026-09-25 (UTC)

Complete coverage27,292 / 27,295 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-15 → 2026-09-25 (UTC)
Events
8.6K
Pushes
8.2K
Pull requests
1
Issues
60
Stars
21
Forks
2

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 1138 days from 2023-08-15 to 2026-09-25. Pushes: 8,158 total, peak 28 in a day. Pull requests: 1 total, peak 1 in a day. Issues: 60 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 331 total, peak 21 in a day. Stars: 21 total, peak 1 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
scripting8.3K8.1K0134
richb-hanover250024
yudel7007
moosebegab6006
andrewshell6006
cagrimmett5005
danbarnes5005
frankleahy35004
scotthansonde5005
fmcpherson4004
grantdunham4004
burbridge4004
manton4004
mokuyo3003
iolaire3003
jon-ault3003
jsavin3003
donpark3003
sillygwailo3003
WSeidlich3002

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 21 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.