Skip to content

active 2025-03-062026-01-06 (UTC)

Partial coverage16,771 / 21,271 hourly files (79%) · 2 absent upstream · 4,499 failed, retryable2024-03-082026-08-12 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
55
Pushes
26
Pull requests
0
Issues
4
Stars
8
Forks
0

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 307 days from 2025-03-06 to 2026-01-06. Pushes: 26 total, peak 10 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 4 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 17 total, peak 6 in a day. Stars: 8 total, peak 2 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
dieggsy4226012
mikesteele813003
snunez12002

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#14mikesteele812025-06-23 15:16
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue#17dieggsy2025-06-23 00:32
    clsql-sqlite3: dynamic types likely broken
  • Issue comment#14dieggsy2025-06-22 04:57
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue comment#14mikesteele812025-06-22 01:46
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue comment#14dieggsy2025-06-21 22:46
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue comment#14dieggsy2025-06-21 22:34
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue#15dieggsy2025-06-21 22:25
    clsql-odbc: Check and validate :result-types more thoroughly
  • Issue comment#14dieggsy2025-06-21 22:21
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue#14dieggsy2025-06-21 20:28
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue comment#14dieggsy2025-06-21 20:28
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue comment#14dieggsy2025-06-21 20:09
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue comment#14dieggsy2025-06-21 19:46
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue comment#14mikesteele812025-06-20 21:02
    Is there support for fields storing binary data through ODBC?
  • Issue comment#7snunez12025-06-06 00:21
    Consider using closer-mop
  • Issue comment#2dieggsy2025-06-05 15:30
    Port CLSQL to CFFI without requiring cffi-uffi-compat
  • Issue comment#2snunez12025-06-04 04:28
    Port CLSQL to CFFI without requiring cffi-uffi-compat
  • Issue comment#4dieggsy2025-03-15 15:18
    Port clsql-sqlite3 to CFFI without cffi-uffi-compat
  • Issue comment#3dieggsy2025-03-09 23:49
    Port clsql-odbc to CFFI without cffi-uffi-compat
  • Issue comment#9dieggsy2025-03-09 23:45
    Add user override mechanism for CFFI foreign libraries
  • Issue#9dieggsy2025-03-09 23:21
    Add user override mechanism for CFFI foreign libraries
  • Issue comment#3dieggsy2025-03-07 01:48
    Port clsql-odbc to CFFI without cffi-uffi-compat

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 8 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.