Skip to content
GitHub Explorer

shieldify-security/issues

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

active 2024-07-19 → 2024-08-21 (UTC)

Partial coverage19,109 / 24,612 hourly files (78%) · 2 absent upstream · 5,500 failed, retryable2023-10-22 → 2026-08-12 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
66
Pushes
0
Pull requests
0
Issues
38
Stars
0
Forks
0

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 34 days from 2024-07-19 to 2024-08-21. Pushes: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 38 total, peak 8 in a day. Comments: 27 total, peak 6 in a day. Stars: 0 total, peak 0 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
00xWizard24007
ShieldifyMartin17008
maushish9002
Atharv1817006
djanerch15004
hunter-w3b2000
Tri-pathi1000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#19Atharv1812024-08-21 06:11
    `_depositStETH()` function increase the number of bond by shares while transfering the stETH receiver will receive less shares
  • Issue#19ShieldifyMartin2024-08-18 06:16
    `_depositStETH()` function increase the number of bond by shares while transfering the stETH receiver will receive less shares
  • Issue#15ShieldifyMartin2024-08-16 17:19
    `AssetRecovererLib` lacks access control for functions
  • Issue#31ShieldifyMartin2024-08-16 17:18
    unbounded Input Sizes in `processSlashingProof`, `processWithdrawalProof`, and `processHistoricalWithdrawalProof` might cause DoS Attack
  • Issue#39ShieldifyMartin2024-08-16 17:18
    Excessive Penalties in `CSModule::submitWithdrawal` Function due to integer underflow
  • Issue comment#39ShieldifyMartin2024-08-16 17:00
    Excessive Penalties in `CSModule::submitWithdrawal` Function due to integer underflow
  • Issue comment#39ShieldifyMartin2024-08-16 16:51
    Excessive Penalties in `CSModule::submitWithdrawal` Function due to integer underflow
  • Issue comment#3900xWizard2024-08-16 16:43
    Excessive Penalties in `CSModule::submitWithdrawal` Function due to integer underflow
  • Issue comment#3400xWizard2024-08-15 21:49
    Missing Bond Check in `CSModule::reportELRewardsStealingPenalty` Function
  • Issue comment#13ShieldifyMartin2024-08-15 08:56
    `CSBondCore.sol::_depositEth()` function passing the hardcoded address(0) as a _refreral, Hence loss of rewards
  • Issue comment#13Atharv1812024-08-15 08:39
    `CSBondCore.sol::_depositEth()` function passing the hardcoded address(0) as a _refreral, Hence loss of rewards
  • Issue comment#12ShieldifyMartin2024-08-15 08:14
    Denial of Service attack in `CSAccounting`
  • Issue comment#4100xWizard2024-08-15 06:36
    Wrong Implementation of the `CSModule::getActiveNodeOperatorsCount` Function
  • Issue comment#3400xWizard2024-08-15 05:24
    Missing Bond Check in `CSModule::reportELRewardsStealingPenalty` Function
  • Issue comment#12djanerch12024-08-14 21:08
    Denial of Service attack in `CSAccounting`
  • Issue comment#3200xWizard2024-08-14 04:22
    Rounding Errors due to Unenforced Permit Amount Requirement in `CSModule::addNodeOperatorStETH` and `CSModule::addNodeOperatorWstETH`
  • Issue comment#15djanerch12024-08-13 20:31
    `AssetRecovererLib` lacks access control for functions
  • Issue comment#7djanerch12024-08-13 20:12
    `StakingRouter` contract can be re-initialized by malicious actor
  • Issue comment#7djanerch12024-08-13 20:08
    `StakingRouter` contract can be re-initialized by malicious actor
  • Issue#43ShieldifyMartin2024-08-11 17:21
    Incorrect event parameter order in `CSAccounting::depositWstETH`
  • Issue comment#3100xWizard2024-08-11 17:06
    unbounded Input Sizes in `processSlashingProof`, `processWithdrawalProof`, and `processHistoricalWithdrawalProof` might cause DoS Attack
  • Issue comment#4300xWizard2024-08-11 16:42
    Incorrect event parameter order in `CSAccounting::depositWstETH`
  • Issue comment#31ShieldifyMartin2024-08-11 13:27
    unbounded Input Sizes in `processSlashingProof`, `processWithdrawalProof`, and `processHistoricalWithdrawalProof` might cause DoS Attack
  • Issue comment#20ShieldifyMartin2024-08-11 13:22
    staking `stEth` in `CSAccounting` is considered as ETH amount
  • Issue comment#9ShieldifyMartin2024-08-11 08:20
    Also with revert in `StakingRouter's` receive function users can direct send eth to contract

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 0 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.