Skip to content

WACV2024 MICS: Midpoint Interpolation to Learn Compact and Separated Representations for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning

active 2023-10-252025-04-14 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,541 / 26,541 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-24 (UTC)
Events
110
Pushes
11
Pull requests
0
Issues
7
Stars
86
Forks
1

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 538 days from 2023-10-25 to 2025-04-14. Pushes: 11 total, peak 10 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 7 total, peak 1 in a day. Comments: 3 total, peak 1 in a day. Stars: 86 total, peak 25 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
solangii141102
Wang-Z-W2001
hmm11162000
CapableCat2000
WangYJ-WYJ1000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#4Wang-Z-W2024-04-01 09:17
    About the pretrained model(base session training)
  • Issue comment#4solangii2024-03-26 06:09
    About the pretrained model(base session training)
  • Issue#4Wang-Z-W2024-03-26 05:43
    About the pretrained model(base session training)
  • Issue#3hmm11162024-03-10 08:11
    pretrained weight for other dataset
  • Issue#2CapableCat2024-03-06 15:28
    The accuracy of the provided pre-trained model for the mini-imagenet does not match the paper
  • Issue#3hmm11162024-02-27 01:46
    pretrained weight for other dataset
  • Issue comment#1solangii2024-02-19 03:42
    Have you followed mainstream methods such as CEC for your data partitioning? It is not clearly articulated in the paper.
  • Issue#1solangii2024-02-19 03:42
    Have you followed mainstream methods such as CEC for your data partitioning? It is not clearly articulated in the paper.
  • Issue#2CapableCat2024-01-19 11:16
    The accuracy of the provided pre-trained model for the mini-imagenet does not match the paper
  • Issue#1WangYJ-WYJ2024-01-18 01:56
    Have you followed mainstream methods such as CEC for your data partitioning? It is not clearly articulated in the paper.

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 86 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.