Skip to content

tc39/proposal-iterator-sequencing

View on GitHub ↗Related repositories →

a TC39 proposal to create iterators by sequencing existing iterators

active 2024-05-122026-01-20 (UTC)

Partial coverage16,025 / 19,966 hourly files (80%) · 2 absent upstream · 3,940 failed, retryable2024-05-022026-08-11 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
203
Pushes
49
Pull requests
20
Issues
17
Stars
36
Forks
1

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 619 days from 2024-05-12 to 2026-01-20. Pushes: 49 total, peak 5 in a day. Pull requests: 20 total, peak 4 in a day. Issues: 17 total, peak 3 in a day. Comments: 48 total, peak 11 in a day. Stars: 36 total, peak 3 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
michaelficarra84321718
bakkot261315
github-actions[bot]161600
ljharb6005
zloirock6005
nicolo-ribaudo2002
syg1001
sosukesuzuki1001
gibson0421000
jessealama1001

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Pull request#27michaelficarra2025-11-03 23:13
  • Pull request#26michaelficarra2025-06-20 04:34
  • Issue#20michaelficarra2025-06-20 02:08
    Return completions when yield* is used
  • Issue comment#25michaelficarra2025-05-31 06:37
    What are the results of this proposal presentation at the May 2025 TC39 meeting?
  • Issue#25michaelficarra2025-05-31 06:37
    What are the results of this proposal presentation at the May 2025 TC39 meeting?
  • Issue#25zloirock2025-05-30 21:39
    What are the results of this proposal presentation at the May 2025 TC39 meeting?
  • Issue#24michaelficarra2025-05-29 13:16
    Current spec text misuses %IteratorHelperPrototype%
  • Issue comment#24bakkot2025-05-28 20:08
    Current spec text misuses %IteratorHelperPrototype%
  • Issue#24gibson0422025-05-28 20:06
    Current spec text misuses %IteratorHelperPrototype%
  • Issue#21michaelficarra2025-05-12 00:54
    IteratorStep result == done cannot be passed to IteratorValue
  • Issue#21michaelficarra2025-05-12 00:54
    IteratorStep result == done cannot be passed to IteratorValue
  • Pull request#23michaelficarra2025-05-12 00:54
  • Issue comment#23michaelficarra2025-05-12 00:49
    inline IteratorStep so we can IteratorValue the result object
  • Issue comment#20michaelficarra2025-05-12 00:12
    Return completions when yield* is used
  • Issue comment#16michaelficarra2025-05-12 00:05
    Should it support non-iterable iterators?
  • Issue#16michaelficarra2025-05-12 00:05
    Should it support non-iterable iterators?
  • Issue comment#23bakkot2025-05-11 16:57
    inline IteratorStep so we can IteratorValue the result object
  • Pull request#23michaelficarra2025-05-11 14:54
  • Issue comment#16bakkot2024-10-30 23:47
    Should it support non-iterable iterators?
  • Issue comment#16zloirock2024-10-30 23:38
    Should it support non-iterable iterators?
  • Issue comment#16bakkot2024-10-30 23:35
    Should it support non-iterable iterators?
  • Issue comment#16zloirock2024-10-30 23:22
    Should it support non-iterable iterators?
  • Issue comment#16bakkot2024-10-30 23:08
    Should it support non-iterable iterators?
  • Issue comment#16zloirock2024-10-30 22:47
    Should it support non-iterable iterators?
  • Issue comment#16bakkot2024-10-30 22:22
    Should it support non-iterable iterators?

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 36 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.