ECMAScript proposal for type syntax that is erased - Stage 1
active 2025-03-15 → 2026-06-10 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 453 days from 2025-03-15 to 2026-06-10. Pushes: 3 total, peak 2 in a day. Pull requests: 4 total, peak 2 in a day. Issues: 8 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 52 total, peak 7 in a day. Stars: 56 total, peak 2 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ljharb | 9 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| orta | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| lemanschik | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| cers000 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| shaedrich | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| idleman | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| conartist6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| egasimus | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| dfabulich | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| ReinsBrain | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| JoshuaKGoldberg | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| azder | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| gustavopch | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| someone-aka-sum1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| NiedziolkaMichal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| robpalme | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Gokul-Gireesh | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| raythurnvoid | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DartViet | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Download | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue comment#248idleman2026-06-10 23:32Why is syntax the preferred integration point?
- Issue comment#246idleman2026-06-06 01:21Why is this proposal blocked at stage 1?
- Issue comment#209dfabulich2026-03-12 05:58Performance benefits of static typing
- Issue#247Gokul-Gireesh2026-03-12 04:04Concerns on Syntax Erasure and the Long-term Runtime Potential of Type Annotations
- Issue comment#167unional2026-03-06 09:27consider namespace
- Issue comment#246shaedrich2026-02-20 00:53Why is this proposal blocked at stage 1?
- Issue comment#244DartViet2026-01-30 06:40the market moves with or without ecmascript
- Issue comment#244gustavopch2025-12-19 10:44the market moves with or without ecmascript
- Issue comment#244ljharb2025-12-19 04:17the market moves with or without ecmascript
- Issue comment#244egasimus2025-12-19 01:16the market moves with or without ecmascript
- Issue comment#244egasimus2025-12-17 16:48the market moves with or without ecmascript
- Issue comment#244ReinsBrain2025-12-07 11:09the market moves with or without ecmascript
- Issue comment#229egasimus2025-11-21 00:04Experimental forward compatible type-stripper
- Issue comment#245lemanschik2025-11-17 08:15Proposal: Strategy for Advancing Type Annotations to Stage 2: Engine Implementation and Tooling Contract
- Issue#245lemanschik2025-11-17 07:02PR: Strategy for Advancing Type Annotations to Stage 2: Engine Implementation and Tooling Contract
- Issue comment#244ReinsBrain2025-11-15 17:24the market moves with or without ecmascript
- Issue comment#244idleman2025-11-14 20:01the market moves with or without ecmascript
- Issue comment#218lemanschik2025-11-07 20:59Please can this proposal not die, Python achieved adding types
- Issue comment#218lemanschik2025-11-07 08:54Please can this proposal not die, Python achieved adding types
- Issue comment#218ljharb2025-11-07 08:19Please can this proposal not die, Python achieved adding types
- Issue comment#218ljharb2025-11-07 08:10Please can this proposal not die, Python achieved adding types
- Issue comment#218lemanschik2025-11-07 08:09Please can this proposal not die, Python achieved adding types
- Issue comment#218lemanschik2025-11-07 07:23Please can this proposal not die, Python achieved adding types
- Issue comment#1340c3d7r42025-11-07 05:30Arguments in favor of abandoning/rejecting this proposal.
- Issue comment#167raythurnvoid2025-11-02 06:54consider namespace
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 56 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.