A Python package to efficiently simulate non-Markovian open quantum systems with process tensors. + skills
active 2023-08-15 → 2026-06-14 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 1035 days from 2023-08-15 to 2026-06-14. Pushes: 39 total, peak 6 in a day. Pull requests: 35 total, peak 3 in a day. Issues: 73 total, peak 18 in a day. Comments: 175 total, peak 7 in a day. Stars: 43 total, peak 2 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| piperfw | 145 | 20 | 11 | 91 |
| gefux | 128 | 19 | 15 | 50 |
| ewenlawrence | 12 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Sampreet | 11 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| rmadw | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| ZhiGuangLu | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| emile-cochin | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| paulreastham | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| eoin-dp-oneill | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| KristinBArnardottir | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| nelyasi | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| hmyuuu | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| fegarciaga | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| aidanstrathearn | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| BrendonLovett1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sion2002-create | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue#162Sion2002-create2026-04-13 10:30Issue with specific coupling strength for time-dependent dynamics.
- Issue comment#162piperfw2026-03-22 00:44Issue with specific coupling strength for time-dependent dynamics.
- Pull request#158gefux2026-02-23 10:45
- Issue comment#155paulreastham2026-02-15 09:44Implementing TTI-PTs in OQuPy
- Issue comment#155gefux2026-02-14 15:47Implementing TTI-PTs in OQuPy
- Issue#155gefux2026-02-14 13:43Implementing TTI-PTs in OQuPy
- Issue comment#157gefux2026-02-14 13:41Problem recalling the augmented mps after a PT_TEBD compute
- Issue#156gefux2026-02-14 13:30About coupling multiple baths to an open system
- Issue comment#154BrendonLovett12026-01-30 10:10Calculating two-time correlations for a chain of sites
- Issue#154gefux2026-01-29 09:28Calculating two-time correlations for a chain of sites
- Issue comment#151piperfw2025-07-21 05:44Adds an alternative method to compute eta_function in CustomSD to deal with large memory-lengths
- Issue comment#150gefux2025-07-20 16:58Adding an alternative integrator to deal with fast oscillations in long memory-length numerical integrations for CustomSD
- Issue comment#150emile-cochin2025-06-30 17:15Adding an alternative integrator to deal with fast oscillations in long memory-length numerical integrations for CustomSD
- Issue comment#150piperfw2025-06-19 17:15Adding an alternative integrator to deal with fast oscillations in long memory-length numerical integrations for CustomSD
- Pull request#151emile-cochin2025-06-19 15:07
- Issue#149piperfw2025-06-10 18:23non-local correlations for a chain
- Issue comment#149piperfw2025-06-10 18:22non-local correlations for a chain
- Issue#149piperfw2025-06-10 18:22non-local correlations for a chain
- Issue comment#149piperfw2025-06-10 15:12non-local correlations for a chain
- Issue comment#149piperfw2025-06-10 12:24non-local correlations for a chain
- Issue#149fegarciaga2025-06-09 18:56non-local correlations for a chain
- Issue comment#147piperfw2025-03-12 07:09Does it effective for a special spectral density?
- Issue comment#147ZhiGuangLu2025-03-12 06:05Does it effective for a special spectral density?
- Issue comment#147piperfw2025-03-11 21:39Does it effective for a special spectral density?
- Issue#148ZhiGuangLu2025-03-11 17:56Does it effective for a special spectral density?
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 43 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.