Skip to content

Uplift modeling and causal inference with machine learning algorithms

active 2025-03-282026-08-04 (UTC)

Partial coverage11,277 / 12,038 hourly files (94%) · 2 absent upstream · 758 failed, retryable2025-03-272026-08-10 (UTC)— sampled evenly across the window, so rankings and trends hold; absolute counts scale up.
Events
547
Pushes
63
Pull requests
47
Issues
19
Stars
259
Forks
29

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 495 days from 2025-03-28 to 2026-08-04. Pushes: 63 total, peak 6 in a day. Pull requests: 47 total, peak 5 in a day. Issues: 19 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 58 total, peak 5 in a day. Stars: 259 total, peak 8 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
jeongyoonlee134612819
Copilot33027
aman-coder039027
paullo01067003
IyarLin5023
ras445001
CLAassistant4004
aaelony3012
PelinV3000
stasf253001
jbbqqf3012
zhenyuz05002110
emilioMaddalena2002
salmanmkc2020
mohsinm-dev2020
xrhd2020
portchester19892000
benglotzer1000
Harpati1010
HSJung931010

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue comment#304jeongyoonlee2026-07-03 03:55
    return_components for R-Learner
  • Pull request#919xrhd2026-06-28 21:07
  • Pull request#918xrhd2026-06-20 23:31
  • Pull request#914HSJung932026-06-17 00:58
  • Issue#911jeongyoonlee2026-06-12 23:45
    Make meta-learners scikit-learn-compliant estimators (inherit BaseEstimator)
  • Pull request#909jeongyoonlee2026-06-08 22:31
  • Pull request#909jeongyoonlee2026-06-08 21:44
  • Issue comment#854jbbqqf2026-05-09 18:44
    CausalML is not compatible with Scikit-Learn Pipeline
  • Issue comment#517jbbqqf2026-05-09 18:44
    Question - Cross-validation and Impact of overfitting
  • Pull request#899jbbqqf2026-05-09 18:41
  • Issue comment#855aman-coder032026-05-01 06:48
    Polars support on CausalML
  • Issue comment#886aman-coder032026-04-25 13:04
    Add post-fit confidence intervals to `BaseTLearner` via `store_bootstraps` and `return_ci`
  • Pull request#891jeongyoonlee2026-04-24 03:56
  • Issue comment#538jeongyoonlee2026-04-24 03:47
    Uplift Forest parameters for multiple treatments
  • Issue comment#622jeongyoonlee2026-04-24 03:46
    Can the methods in causalml be trained with incremental training?
  • Issue comment#489jeongyoonlee2026-04-24 03:29
    is there any way to predict without installing casualml?
  • Issue comment#537jeongyoonlee2026-04-24 03:20
    Question re: Uplift Forest calibration
  • Issue comment#889Whatsonyourmind2026-04-05 05:05
    Add bootstrap confidence intervals and p-values to `rate_score()`
  • Issue comment#886aman-coder032026-03-27 05:21
    Add post-fit confidence intervals to `BaseTLearner` via `store_bootstraps` and `return_ci`
  • Issue#540jeongyoonlee2026-03-21 05:16
    Add the Rank-weighted Average Treatment Effect (RATE) metric
  • Pull request#887aman-coder032026-03-21 05:16
  • Issue comment#887jeongyoonlee2026-03-21 05:05
    Add Rank-weighted Average Treatment Effect (RATE) metric
  • Issue comment#887aman-coder032026-03-14 08:30
    Add Rank-weighted Average Treatment Effect (RATE) metric
  • Issue#594jeongyoonlee2026-03-13 18:55
    Reduce number of 3rd party packages required for a prediction-only setup
  • Issue#561jeongyoonlee2026-03-13 18:46
    Currently Uplift Tree/Forest methods run into issues when there is missing data. Is imputing the missing data the only solution now?

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 259 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.