Skip to content

A Draft Note explaining how to write explainers

active 2025-01-302025-03-05 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,410 / 26,410 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-19 (UTC)
Events
21
Pushes
3
Pull requests
0
Issues
15
Stars
0
Forks
0

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 35 days from 2025-01-30 to 2025-03-05. Pushes: 3 total, peak 3 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 15 total, peak 15 in a day. Comments: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Stars: 0 total, peak 0 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
jyasskin11300
matatk2000
torgo1000
csarven1000
hober1000
alice1000
ChristopherA1000

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue#18ChristopherA2025-03-05 09:57
    Add Section in Template for Synergy/Alignments?
  • Issue#17hober2025-03-05 09:57
    Explainer explainer should more strongly encourage authors to surface security and privacy considerations
  • Issue#15alice2025-03-05 09:57
    IDL in explainers?
  • Issue#13jyasskin2025-03-05 09:56
    Consider turning the Explainer Explainer into a Note
  • Issue#12torgo2025-03-05 09:55
    Explainer template needs to make it clear you don't need to fill out everything for every review
  • Issue#11jyasskin2025-03-05 09:55
    Suggest linking to developer-facing materials or research
  • Issue#10jyasskin2025-03-05 09:55
    Ask for multi-stakeholder review in the Explainer Explainer
  • Issue#9jyasskin2025-03-05 09:54
    Update the WebIDL guidance for explainers
  • Issue#8jyasskin2025-03-05 09:54
    Explain why to write an explainer
  • Issue#7jyasskin2025-03-05 09:54
    Explain why to focus on the end-user's need, and/or moderate that advice
  • Issue#6jyasskin2025-03-05 09:54
    Discuss the lifecycle of explainers
  • Issue#5jyasskin2025-03-05 09:53
    Discuss the ideal granularity for explainers
  • Issue#4csarven2025-03-05 09:53
    Discuss involving participants from multiple skill sets and global locations in the explainer
  • Issue#3matatk2025-03-05 09:53
    Terminology: "Non-goals" meaning
  • Issue#2matatk2025-03-05 09:52
    Optional section on roadmap (future version plans) for the spec

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 0 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.