A VPN Designed for Lossy Links, with Build-in Forward Error Correction(FEC) Support. Improves your Network Quality on a High-latency Lossy Link.
active 2024-01-19 → 2026-07-02 (UTC)
Activity over time
Daily event counts in the loaded window
Line chart, 896 days from 2024-01-19 to 2026-07-02. Pushes: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 16 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 52 total, peak 17 in a day. Stars: 198 total, peak 14 in a day.
- Pushes
- Pull requests
- Issues
- Comments
- Stars
Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.
Top contributors
Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity
| Contributor | Contributions | Pushes | PRs | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| wangyu- | 31 | 0 | 0 | 31 |
| maojianyou | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| thisdk | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| its0ka | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| iopq | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| PHCSJC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| lonnietc | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| czf1009 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| LanYunDev | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| frankozland | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| fmnx | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| M1UniTrust | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recent activity
Latest issues, pull requests and releases
- Issue comment#134iopq2025-12-10 09:05Additional unexplained latency
- Issue comment#134iopq2025-12-10 08:55Additional unexplained latency
- Issue#134iopq2025-12-10 08:49Additional unexplained latency
- Issue comment#70czf10092025-07-14 12:37tinyvpn能否部署在docker中运行？
- Issue comment#70thisdk2025-07-14 12:20tinyvpn能否部署在docker中运行？
- Issue comment#70czf10092025-07-14 08:00tinyvpn能否部署在docker中运行？
- Issue#132M1UniTrust2025-01-31 04:362025 稳定梯子推荐
- Issue#131fmnx2025-01-15 03:41安卓客户端的问题
- Issue comment#129frankozland2024-10-06 22:21Would compressing headers improve bandwidth?
- Issue#129frankozland2024-10-06 22:14Would compressing headers improve bandwidth?
- Issue#126maojianyou2024-09-22 00:02Can the kernel support MPTCP, like Shadowsocks-rust does, and are there similar technologies like kcp MPQUIC, etc., that are supported as well?
- Issue#127maojianyou2024-09-22 00:01Currently, only the TUN interface is supported, and this interface operates at Layer 3. Is it possible to implement Layer 2 support similar to OpenVPN's TAP interface?
- Issue comment#127maojianyou2024-09-21 16:27Currently, only the TUN interface is supported, and this interface operates at Layer 3. Is it possible to implement Layer 2 support similar to OpenVPN's TAP interface?
- Issue comment#126wangyu-2024-09-21 05:22Can the kernel support MPTCP, like Shadowsocks-rust does, and are there similar technologies like kcp MPQUIC, etc., that are supported as well?
- Issue comment#126maojianyou2024-09-21 01:26Can the kernel support MPTCP, like Shadowsocks-rust does, and are there similar technologies like kcp MPQUIC, etc., that are supported as well?
- Issue comment#126wangyu-2024-09-19 22:16Can the kernel support MPTCP, like Shadowsocks-rust does, and are there similar technologies like kcp MPQUIC, etc., that are supported as well?
- Issue comment#127wangyu-2024-09-19 22:09Currently, only the TUN interface is supported, and this interface operates at Layer 3. Is it possible to implement Layer 2 support similar to OpenVPN's TAP interface?
- Issue comment#126wangyu-2024-09-19 22:08Can the kernel support MPTCP, like Shadowsocks-rust does, and are there similar technologies like kcp MPQUIC, etc., that are supported as well?
- Issue#127maojianyou2024-09-18 01:45Currently, only the TUN interface is supported, and this interface operates at Layer 3. Is it possible to implement Layer 2 support similar to OpenVPN's TAP interface?
- Issue comment#118maojianyou2024-09-16 00:56After testing, it was found that the VPN tunnel does not support VXLAN and IP_GRE
- Issue#118maojianyou2024-09-16 00:56After testing, it was found that the VPN tunnel does not support VXLAN and IP_GRE
- Issue#126maojianyou2024-09-16 00:43Can the kernel support MPTCP, like Shadowsocks-rust does, and are there similar technologies like MPQUIC, etc., that are supported as well?
- Issue comment#118maojianyou2024-07-14 09:12After testing, it was found that the VPN tunnel does not support VXLAN and IP_GRE
- Issue comment#125thisdk2024-07-06 14:39wireguard与openvpn稳定性的是否有差别
- Issue comment#125wangyu-2024-07-05 17:01wireguard与openvpn稳定性的是否有差别
Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 198 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.