Skip to content

[CVPR 2022] Part-based Pseudo Label Refinement for Unsupervised Person Re-identification

active 2023-08-152025-07-09 (UTC)

Complete coverage26,672 / 26,672 hourly files (100%) · 2 absent upstream2023-08-152026-08-30 (UTC)
Events
36
Pushes
3
Pull requests
0
Issues
5
Stars
20
Forks
5

Activity over time

Daily event counts in the loaded window

Line chart, 695 days from 2023-08-15 to 2025-07-09. Pushes: 3 total, peak 1 in a day. Pull requests: 0 total, peak 0 in a day. Issues: 5 total, peak 2 in a day. Comments: 3 total, peak 1 in a day. Stars: 20 total, peak 1 in a day.

  • Pushes
  • Pull requests
  • Issues
  • Comments
  • Stars

Stars, PRs, issues and forks are under-captured in the later part of this window. GH Archive progressively stopped capturing non-push events during 2026 — −95% or worse by the end of the window. Every series here except Pushes fades for that reason, so a decline above reflects the archive, not this repository. Pushes stay reliable throughout, so read them, and the contributor counts derived from them, as the real signal. Data health has the measurements.

Top contributors

Pushes, PRs, issues, reviews and comments — stars and forks excluded, so this is contribution rather than popularity

ContributorContributionsPushesPRsComments
yoonkicho5300
koamd3001
qingsonghu081001
LYL-hub-source1000
newbie5211001

Recent activity

Latest issues, pull requests and releases

  • Issue#15yoonkicho2024-07-31 20:59
    A few questions about the code implementation
  • Issue#17yoonkicho2024-07-31 20:59
    Hello Professor. When using the DukeMTMC dataset, labeled training can be run through, but the data for unlabeled training is very low. What is the reason?
  • Issue comment#18koamd2024-03-21 15:15
    Clarification on training process
  • Issue#18koamd2024-03-21 15:15
    Clarification on training process
  • Issue#18koamd2024-03-18 17:48
    Clarification on training process
  • Issue comment#10qingsonghu082023-11-24 08:36
    about Accuracy
  • Issue comment#10newbie5212023-10-19 14:59
    about Accuracy
  • Issue#17LYL-hub-source2023-08-30 08:55
    Hello Professor. When using the DukeMTMC dataset, labeled training can be run through, but the data for unlabeled training is very low. What is the reason?

Totals cover only the window loaded into ClickHouse and count events, not GitHub's lifetime totals — 20 stars here means stars gained during the window, not the repo's star count.